Publishers Weekly
03/16/2020
Northwestern University history professor Cadava (Standing on Common Ground) offers an evenhanded and exhaustive analysis of how the Republican Party built its base of Hispanic support. Noting that Republican presidential candidates have won roughly one-third of the Hispanic vote in every election since 1972, Cadava explores efforts to align Hispanic and Republican priorities on Puerto Rican statehood, sanctions against Cuba, and the flow of undocumented immigrants across the U.S.-Mexico border. He profiles such activists as Benjamin “Boxcar Ben” Fernandez, cofounder of the Republican National Hispanic Assembly; notes examples of political patronage, including the appointments of three Mexican American women as U.S. treasurer; and documents the impact of the Elián González case on the 2000 Bush-Gore election. In a brisk final chapter, Cadava addresses a 2013 Republican National Committee report urging the party to expand its base by supporting a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, and the refusal of many Hispanic Republicans to “turn their backs” on President Trump, in spite of his nativist rhetoric and policies. Deep dives into committees, campaigns, referendums, and polling data sometimes make for a ponderous reading experience but deliver a wealth of insights. This granular account offers essential context on a voting bloc with an outsize influence on American politics. (May)
From the Publisher
"Thoughtful, fair-minded, and learned, Cadava's eye-opening book will teach experts on American politics things they didn't even know they didn't know." — Rick Perlstein, bestselling author of Nixonland and The Invisible Bridge
“Geraldo Cadava’s history...provides a unique vantage point on US politics; on the shifting terrains of foreign policy, labor, and religion; and on the changing nature of specific states, as well as on deeper ideological fights over the soul of the country: is it to be an inclusive nation of immigrants, or, as the nativists today say, a country founded on white supremacy? An excellent, insightful study.” — Greg Grandin, professor of history at Yale University and author of The End of the Myth
“Geraldo Cadava offers a fascinating examination of the socioeconomic interests and foreign policy concerns that have drawn Hispanics/Latinos into a rapidly changing Republican Party. If readers harbor the mistaken idea that Hispanics are a monolithic voting bloc, this book should dispel this idea once and for all. Though the work is written for a general audience, even experts on Hispanic politics and voting behavior will find much that is new and surprising in these chapters.” — María Cristina García, author of The Refugee Challenge in Post–Cold War America
Greg Grandin
Geraldo Cadava’s history...provides a unique vantage point on US politics; on the shifting terrains of foreign policy, labor, and religion; and on the changing nature of specific states, as well as on deeper ideological fights over the soul of the country: is it to be an inclusive nation of immigrants, or, as the nativists today say, a country founded on white supremacy? An excellent, insightful study.
María Cristina García
Geraldo Cadava offers a fascinating examination of the socioeconomic interests and foreign policy concerns that have drawn Hispanics/Latinos into a rapidly changing Republican Party. If readers harbor the mistaken idea that Hispanics are a monolithic voting bloc, this book should dispel this idea once and for all. Though the work is written for a general audience, even experts on Hispanic politics and voting behavior will find much that is new and surprising in these chapters.
Rick Perlstein
"Thoughtful, fair-minded, and learned, Cadava's eye-opening book will teach experts on American politics things they didn't even know they didn't know."
Library Journal
04/01/2020
Cadava (history, Northwestern Univ.; Standing on Common Ground) has produced one of the few scholarly book-length treatments of Hispanic/Latino conservatism in the United States. Focusing on the period 1952–2000, Cadava walks through the metamorphosing relationship of Hispanics with the Republican Party. Conservatives have long contended that Latino/as have a natural affinity for the Republican Party, with its espoused values of faith, family, and freedom. This alleged affinity sits uneasily with the nativist rhetoric and anti-welfare, anti-immigration policies of figures such as Pat Buchanan and Donald Trump. Notwithstanding this tension, Latinos have awarded Republicans one-third of their votes in presidential elections since 1972. Cadava traces this party loyalty to Cold War-era anticommunism, as well as concerted efforts by the Nixon, Reagan, and Bush administrations to court Latino voters. The author also highlights the diversity among Hispanic communities and causes. Tightly focused on the leaders and events of Hispanic conservatism, Cadava touches only in passing on cultural, liberal, or pre-1950 Latino traditions. Most books concerning Hispanic Republicans are memoirs or commentary, notably Linda Chavez's Unlikely Conservative, Mike Gonzalez's Race for the Future, and Leslie Sanchez's Los Republicanos. In this field, Cadava's scholarship stands out. VERDICT An evenhanded and thought-provoking study of Hispanic conservatism.—Michael Rodriguez, Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs
Kirkus Reviews
2020-03-01
A survey of changing political trends among Latino American constituencies over the last half-century.
Hispanics are not born Democrats, although they have trended that way in the last several elections. It seems likely that they’ll do so in 2020, if only because of the current president’s anti-immigrant and nativist rhetoric. Still, Northwestern University professor Cadava points out, Hispanics voted for him “by a slightly wider margin than the percentage of Hispanics who voted for establishment candidates such as John McCain in 2008 and Mitt Romney in 2012.” The author rightly observes that the Hispanic population is not monolithic: Mexicans, Cubans, Central Americans, and Puerto Ricans bring different cultural sensibilities to the table. Cubans who left their native country because of opposition to Fidel Castro are far more likely to vote Republican, for instance, than Mexican farmworkers in the Southwest, and though most are at least nominally Catholic, both progressive and conservative elements in the Hispanic population can cite church teachings to back their political views. Cadava looks back at the days when Hispanic support was strongest for Republican candidates, as with the Latinos con Eisenhower organization and its follow-up, Latinos con Goldwater, which enjoyed reasonable success because of Goldwater’s determined courtship of Cuban Americans and Mexican Americans. Even Nixon had a so-called “Brown Mafia,” though it relied for support on “doling out government grants and contracts, dangling appointments in front of prominent Hispanics, cutting deals with some of the Chicano movement’s leaders, and efforts to suppress support for McGovern.” Other Republicans have been more worthy of that support—Gerald Ford, for instance, who expanded the Voting Rights Act to include ballots and other election materials written in Spanish. As for the present, Cadava ventures that Hispanic supporters of Trump believe that while he’s “unrefined,” he’s not a racist.
Of interest to political trend watchers—and a warning to Democrats not to take the Latino vote for granted. (8-page color insert)