Acting Alone: A Scientific Study of American Hegemony and Unilateral Use-of-Force Decision Making

Acting Alone: A Scientific Study of American Hegemony and Unilateral Use-of-Force Decision Making

by Bradley F. Podliska
Acting Alone: A Scientific Study of American Hegemony and Unilateral Use-of-Force Decision Making

Acting Alone: A Scientific Study of American Hegemony and Unilateral Use-of-Force Decision Making

by Bradley F. Podliska

Hardcover

$136.00 
  • SHIP THIS ITEM
    Qualifies for Free Shipping
  • PICK UP IN STORE
    Check Availability at Nearby Stores

Related collections and offers


Overview

Acting Alone: A Scientific Study of American Hegemony and Unilateral Use-of-Force Decision Making is a straight-forward analysis of unilateral U.S. military actions, which are dependent upon the power disparity between the U.S. and the rest of the world. In solving the puzzle as to why individual presidents have made the 'wrong' decision to act alone, the author lays out a president's behavior, during a crisis, as a two-step decision process. Acting Alone reviews the well-studied first decision, deciding to use force, based on international conflict literature and organized along traditional lines. The author then details the second decision, deciding to use unilateral force, with an explanation of the criticisms of multilateralism and the reasons for unilateralism. To test a new theory of unilateral use of force decision making, Acting Alone devises a definition and coding rules for unilateral use of force, develops a sequential model of presidential use of force decision making, and constructs a new, alternative measure of military power, a Composite Indicator of Military Revolutions (CIMR). It then uses three methods - a statistical test with a heckman probit model, an experiment, and case studies - to test U.S. crisis behavior since 1937. By applying these three methods, the author finds that presidents are realists and make expected utility calculations to act unilaterally or multilaterally after their decision to use force. The unilateral decision, in particular, positively correlates with a wide military gap with an opponent, an opponent located in the Western hemisphere, and a national security threat.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780739142516
Publisher: Lexington Books
Publication date: 02/15/2010
Series: Innovations in the Study of World Politics
Pages: 272
Product dimensions: 6.20(w) x 9.10(h) x 1.00(d)

About the Author

Bradley F. Podliska is an instructor with the Department of Defense.

Table of Contents

List of Figures xi

List of Tables xiii

Acknowledgments xv

1 Introduction 1

The Puzzle and Research Question 1

Contributions of This Study 6

Methodological Strategy: Statistical, Experimental, and Case Studies 7

Plan of the Book 9

2 Unilateral Use-of-Force Decision Making 19

Introduction 19

American Hegemonic Behavior 20

American Military Power 23

Employing American Military Power: A Two-Step Decision Process 29

The First Decision: Why a President Makes a Use-of-Force Decision 31

The Second Decision: Why a President Makes a Unilateral Use-of-Force Decision 33

A New Model of Unilateral Use-of-Force Decision Making 46

Conclusion 51

3 Statistical Tests: U.S. Unilateral Uses of Force since 1937 69

Introduction 69

Hypotheses 70

The Data Sets 75

The Crisis Dyad 76

Dependent Variable 78

Explanatory Variables 80

Control Variables 86

Statistical Tests 90

The Probit Framework 91

The Heckman Probit Model 99

Conclusion 110

4 Does the Type of Crisis Matter? An Experimental Test 127

Introduction 127

The Study 128

Experimental Method 130

Humanitarian Crisis Results 131

Regime Change Results 132

National Security Results 133

Discussion 134

Conclusion 136

5 Opening Up the "Black Box" of a President's Unilateral Decision: Case Studies of the 1991 Gulf War, 1961 Bay of Pigs Invasion, and 1989 Panama Invasion 141

Introduction 141

1991 Gulf War (Multilateral Case) 142

Bay of Pigs (Unilateral Case) 156

1989 Panama Invasion (Unilateral Case) 167

Conclusion 174

6 Conclusion 185

Introduction 185

Implications from the Statistical Analysis 185

Implications from the Experimental Analysis 188

Implications from the Case Studies Analysis 189

Directions for Future Research 190

Conclusion 192

Appendix A Coding of Crisis Dyads 195

Appendix B Experiment Instructions and Crisis Scenarios 219

Bibliography 227

Index 247

About the Author 255

From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews