Africa - Up in Smoke?: The Second Report from the Working Group on Climate Change and Development

Africa - Up in Smoke?—the second report from a coalition of the U.K.'s top environment and development groups, the Working Group on Climate Change and Development—says that efforts to alleviate poverty in Africa will ultimately fail unless urgent action is taken to halt dangerous climate change. The report says that G8 nations have failed to “connect-the-dots” between climate change and Africa. Unless addressed, this could condemn generations in the world’s poorest nations. The G8 summit can choose to act now, or see human development gains go up in smoke, the coalition warns.

The report, with a foreword by Archbishop Desmond Tutu and pictures, graphics, and case studies throughout, details the impact that climate change is already having on Africa and the threat it poses to human development. Africa - Up in Smoke? calls for new and deeper emission cuts in rich countries, and for the G8 to make significant new funds available to help poor countries adapt to the impacts that are already being felt.
Written with support of with support from Hannah Reid, International Institute for Environment and Development, and based on material supplied by the members of the Working Group on Climate Change and Development: ActionAid International, Bird Life, the Catholic Agency for Overseas Development, Christian Aid, the Catholic Institute for International Relations, Columban Faith and Justice, Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, Institute for Development Studies, IIED (International Institute for Environment and Development), MedAct, nef (new economics foundation), Operation Noah, Oxfam, People & Planet, Practical Action (formerly ITDG), the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Tearfund, teri Europe, WaterAid, and the World Wildlife Fund.

1119231576
Africa - Up in Smoke?: The Second Report from the Working Group on Climate Change and Development

Africa - Up in Smoke?—the second report from a coalition of the U.K.'s top environment and development groups, the Working Group on Climate Change and Development—says that efforts to alleviate poverty in Africa will ultimately fail unless urgent action is taken to halt dangerous climate change. The report says that G8 nations have failed to “connect-the-dots” between climate change and Africa. Unless addressed, this could condemn generations in the world’s poorest nations. The G8 summit can choose to act now, or see human development gains go up in smoke, the coalition warns.

The report, with a foreword by Archbishop Desmond Tutu and pictures, graphics, and case studies throughout, details the impact that climate change is already having on Africa and the threat it poses to human development. Africa - Up in Smoke? calls for new and deeper emission cuts in rich countries, and for the G8 to make significant new funds available to help poor countries adapt to the impacts that are already being felt.
Written with support of with support from Hannah Reid, International Institute for Environment and Development, and based on material supplied by the members of the Working Group on Climate Change and Development: ActionAid International, Bird Life, the Catholic Agency for Overseas Development, Christian Aid, the Catholic Institute for International Relations, Columban Faith and Justice, Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, Institute for Development Studies, IIED (International Institute for Environment and Development), MedAct, nef (new economics foundation), Operation Noah, Oxfam, People & Planet, Practical Action (formerly ITDG), the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Tearfund, teri Europe, WaterAid, and the World Wildlife Fund.

12.75 In Stock
Africa - Up in Smoke?: The Second Report from the Working Group on Climate Change and Development

Africa - Up in Smoke?: The Second Report from the Working Group on Climate Change and Development

Africa - Up in Smoke?: The Second Report from the Working Group on Climate Change and Development

Africa - Up in Smoke?: The Second Report from the Working Group on Climate Change and Development

Paperback

$12.75 
  • SHIP THIS ITEM
    Qualifies for Free Shipping
  • PICK UP IN STORE

    Your local store may have stock of this item.

Related collections and offers


Overview

Africa - Up in Smoke?—the second report from a coalition of the U.K.'s top environment and development groups, the Working Group on Climate Change and Development—says that efforts to alleviate poverty in Africa will ultimately fail unless urgent action is taken to halt dangerous climate change. The report says that G8 nations have failed to “connect-the-dots” between climate change and Africa. Unless addressed, this could condemn generations in the world’s poorest nations. The G8 summit can choose to act now, or see human development gains go up in smoke, the coalition warns.

The report, with a foreword by Archbishop Desmond Tutu and pictures, graphics, and case studies throughout, details the impact that climate change is already having on Africa and the threat it poses to human development. Africa - Up in Smoke? calls for new and deeper emission cuts in rich countries, and for the G8 to make significant new funds available to help poor countries adapt to the impacts that are already being felt.
Written with support of with support from Hannah Reid, International Institute for Environment and Development, and based on material supplied by the members of the Working Group on Climate Change and Development: ActionAid International, Bird Life, the Catholic Agency for Overseas Development, Christian Aid, the Catholic Institute for International Relations, Columban Faith and Justice, Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, Institute for Development Studies, IIED (International Institute for Environment and Development), MedAct, nef (new economics foundation), Operation Noah, Oxfam, People & Planet, Practical Action (formerly ITDG), the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Tearfund, teri Europe, WaterAid, and the World Wildlife Fund.


Product Details

ISBN-13: 9781904882008
Publisher: Oxfam Publishing
Publication date: 06/28/2006
Series: Up in Smoke? Series
Pages: 40
Product dimensions: 8.25(w) x 11.50(h) x 0.10(d)

About the Author

Hannah Reid is at the International Institute for Environment and Development.

Andrew Simms author of Tescopoly, is policy director at nef and a commentator on issues like climate change and 'clone town Britain'. His other publications include Why Good Lives Needn't Cost the Earth and Ecological Debt.

Archbishop Desmond Tutu

Read an Excerpt

CHAPTER 1

Food, farming and the environment – threats and building resilience

Environment – the foundation of livelihoods

Africa's social and economic development is now even more in danger because climate change threatens to undermine the integrity of the continent's rich but fragile ecosystems. In Africa, these natural systems form the foundation of the economy of most countries, from which the majority of the population derive their livelihood. Africa contains about one-fifth of all known species of plants, mammals, and birds, as well as one-sixth of amphibians and reptiles. Biodiversity in Africa, which principally occurs outside formally conserved areas, is under threat from climate change and other stresses. Savannahs, tropical forests, coral reef marine and freshwater habitats, wetlands and East Africa montane ecosystems are all at risk.

Poor people, especially those living in marginal environments and in areas with low agricultural productivity in Africa, depend directly on genetic, species and ecosystem diversity to support their way of life. As a result of this dependency, any impact that climate change has on natural systems will threaten the livelihoods, food intake and health of the population.

With the extinction of plant species used in traditional medicines in Africa, it is expected that the change in climate will impact on people's ability to tackle illness. The World Health Organisation estimates that 80 per cent of the world's population in developing countries rely on these plants for primary health care. In Mali, traditional medicines have declined because many medicinal plants have been wiped out by constant drought.

Livelihoods built for generations on particular patterns of farming may also become quickly unviable. If not addressed, climate change is estimated to place an additional 80–120 million people at risk of hunger; 70 to 80 per cent of these will be in Africa. With increasing temperatures and extreme weather events, climate change will further erode the quality of the natural resource base, thereby reinforcing conditions of poverty.

"Drought is becoming more and more frequent leading to drying-out of soil and the disappearance of vegetation. The life of an entire population is on hold, waiting for clouds, which promise less and less rain and which finally destroy the hope that cattle breeders and their herds will enjoy healthy pastures. They also destroy people's hope for a better tomorrow which would usher in an abundant harvest so passionately awaited by farmers and their creditors."

Malian development group TNT

Mozambique: climate change, disruption and renewing rural livelihoods Despite civil war and major floods and drought, Mozambique has emerged in the 21st century as a country of progress and possibilities, a flagship of renewal in Africa. The Adaptive research project set out to investigate how rural people have adapted to these disturbances so that rural communities can be better supported in the face of future changes, especially climate change.

Research focused on the community of Nwadjahane in Gaza Province in southern Mozambique. The village was established in the 1980s following displacement from surrounding areas during the civil war. Over the years, villagers have had to live with political and economic instability, drought, and major flood and storm damage. Despite these difficult circumstances, villagers have developed creative and innovative ways of coping and adapting to this uncertainty and change.

Social networks are the links and connections that individuals and households have with family, neighbours and friends. Within Nwadjahane, these have evolved and changed over the last 20 years. A fundamental shift is from paying people with cash in exchange for help with tasks on the farm, to 'traditional' forms of noncash bartering, such as exchanging labour. Villagers explain that this is due to the combined drivers of less cash within the local economy (linked to wider economic processes) and the perceived increase in the number of weather-related disturbances.

Increasingly frequent and severe droughts, floods, and storms have led to either less cash being available from crop sales, or simply the need for more labour to replant or repair damaged crops or farm infrastructure. One of the recognised positive outcomes from this shift is an increased sense of solidarity with neighbours.

Using the landscape to spread risk

Villagers in Nwadjahane farm both the fertile lowlands through irrigation and the higher sandy dryland fields. Increasingly severe floods and droughts over the last two decades have increased demand from households for plots of land in both areas. While the lowland can produce good crops of rice, vegetables and potatoes, these can be destroyed during floods. Highland areas can produce good crops of maize and cassava during flood years.

However, during drought years the highlands are less productive and families rely on lowland production. Households with land in just one area have started to develop informal farming associations to lobby those responsible for land allocation. They've successfully managed to gain access to new areas to farm. This is especially important for very poor households as it enables them to share some of the production costs and risks, thus increasing their overall resilience to both droughts and floods. A lesson for development agencies is that external support to these farming systems needs to be careful not to favour one type of farming over another as it is the combination that provides resilience to climatic disruptions.

These farming associations have become the focus of innovative and experimental farming practices. By working in groups, villagers are able to spread the risk of new practices and technologies and learn for themselves through trial, error and experimentation. When successful, farmers have been able to take the lessons learnt back to their own individual farms. For example, 45 per cent of those interviewed had changed to more drought-resistant species of rice, maize, cassava and sweet potato at some point during the last six years as a direct result of the information exchange within and beyond the farming associations. The farming associations act as a buffer against initial risk with both poor and wealthy households able to experiment. The associations have also been particularly popular with groups of women, leading to a strengthening of their position within the farming community. With the support of extension officers these types of initiatives can strengthen livelihoods in the face of climate change and make livelihood activities more profitable and secure.

Within the Nwadjahane community, individuals, households, and formal and informal groupings of people are all looking for ways in which they can reduce their vulnerability to disturbances and increase the resiliency of their livelihoods. Some adaptations are driven specifically by experience of extreme climatic events, but many come from a combination of climatic, environmental, economic, political and cultural issues. The study shows that we need to take climate change seriously but that it must be viewed within the everyday context of people's lives.

The Mozambique Government has recognised this. It sees the need to support local level attempts to build resilience; national planning strategies are deliberately addressing these issues. Some sectors of agriculture are being encouraged to commercialise at a large scale, while smallholders are being encouraged to participate in local level planning to build the human capacity for livelihood renewal. Thus climate change in Mozambique is not being viewed in isolation; it is being dealt with within the context of wider development issues.

Agro-ecology: the way forward for climate-resilient food production

Agriculture in Africa suffers from a persistent lack of investment. It's an issue both at the national level, with African governments cutting back on farming support services, and internationally, with funding from the EU, for example, going more to 'governance' and 'infrastructure'.

Small-scale agriculture provides most of the food produced in Africa, and employs 70 per cent of the workforce. But a lack of investment in drought-resistant farming is in danger of creating serious problems for its ability to adapt in a warming world. Just as financial investors spread risk, it makes sense for farmers to do so as well in the face of global warming. A diversity of both approaches to cropping and to a range of crops is the way to achieve that.

This, in turn, means that farmers need access to seeds that are adapted to drought or reduced rainfall during critical stages in the growing season. A variety of forces have led to a reduced availability of local seeds, and increased dependence on hybrid seeds and crops like maize that are not well adapted to these conditions. Maize needs rain during the development of the cobs, and a gap in rainfall at a crucial time leads to crop failure. Exactly this is happening in Zambia in 2005, despite plentiful rain earlier in the rainy season.

Another pressure comes from the concentration of ownership in the seed industry into a handful of large corporations. Ten companies now control one-third of the global seed industry, further threatening agricultural biodiversity.

A key aspect of an agro-ecological approach is how different developments can produce synergies, leading to win-win situations such as increased production without additional external resources. Diverse cropping systems yield much more produce per unit of land than the mono-cropping favoured by 'modern' agricultural systems. They are also much more suited to the harsh conditions in which most farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa operate.

The example given from the semi-arid area in east Kenya illustrates the process. Sustainable agriculture is a method of farming based on human needs for food, income, shelter, and fuelwood. It also builds an understanding of the long-term effect of our activities on the environment. It integrates practices for plant and animal production, with a focus on pest predator relationships, moisture and plants, soil health and the chemical and physical relationship between plants and animals on the farm.

Most sustainable agricultural initiatives seek to reduce soil erosion and to make improvements to the soil's physical structure through its organic matter content, and water-holding capacity. Water is a clear constraint in many rains-fed systems. When water is better harvested and conserved, it may be the key factor leading to improved agricultural productivity. Provided the soil's nutrient balance is maintained, better water management means better cropping.

Protecting the Gola Forests in Sierra Leone

Deforestation accounts for between 20 and 30 per cent of all greenhouse gas emissions worldwide and has devastating effects on both biodiversity and local communities. The Upper Guinea Forest, which once stretched from Guinea to Ghana, now covers less than one-third of its original area and is highly fragmented into comparatively small areas. Sierra Leone has only one-seventh of its original Upper Guinea Forest remaining, half of which is made up of the 750-square-kilometre Gola Forests in the southeast of the country.

The RSPB and the Conservation Society of Sierra Leone (CSSL) developed one example of an innovative approach to natural resource management that balances peoples' livelihoods with sustainability. They formed a long-term partnership with the Sierra Leone Government and seven chiefdoms to protect the Gola Forests.

Following the recent conflict in Sierra Leone, there was a concern that commercial logging would resume in the Gola Forests, bringing in much needed but short-term money. Instead, the CSSL and the RSPB have concluded a 'conservation concession' agreement with the Sierra Leone Government under which the forest management rights will be used for conservation rather than logging.

Under a logging concession, the Government and local communities would expect incomes from the concession holder through fees and royalties. This potential loss of income has to be compensated for by the new conservation agreement. Income for the Government is fed directly into its Forestry Division to manage and develop the Gola Forests for conservation. Local communities will receive royalties to put into conservation-friendly community development projects. The agreement will also guarantee employment and engagement of communities in the management of the forests. A trust fund will meet these costs in perpetuity.

Will climate change break the herder's back?

Niger and the story of Hamidou Oussemane

Hamidou is a farmer from the village of Guidan Ali in the district of Birnin Konni. His extended family comprises 40 people.

Climate uncertainty is a way of life for Hamidou. As a young child he remembers the good times when the rains were abundant and more reliable than they are today. But since the drought years of the 1970s and 1980s, the rains have never been consistent from one year to the next. Adapting to unpredictable and erratic conditions has not been easy, but over time Hamidou has developed a farming system on which he has raised a family while managing to help others.

The family's livelihood is based on a mixture of farming, livestock keeping, and the selling of fuelwood. The family farms 10 fields covering about 26 hectares located on different soil types (sandy dunes, and low-lying clay areas) and producing a variety of food crops including millet, sorghum and rice, in order of importance. The women cultivate smaller plots on which they grow sorrel and okra. In a good year, the family produces a surplus, which is stocked in the family's granaries, although a small amount of rice may be sold from time to time. The family also looks after 61 cattle of which 41 belong to them. The other animals belong to neighbours and friends. Until 1982, the herd was taken in different seasons either north towards Tahoua, or south to northern Nigeria. But for a variety of reasons, including conflict and the rising costs of accessing pastures in the dry seasons, Hamidou's sons now look after the herd themselves in the vicinity of the village and it is used to manure the family's fields and those of other village members.

Livestock, manure, plentiful household labour, and access to the relatively well-watered clay soils at the base of the sandy hills have been the main ingredients behind Hamidou's success as a farmer. Although he has a large family to look after, he has a big farm by Sahelian standards with a broad mix of land types and soils. In an average year he is able to harvest sufficient food to feed the whole family and put aside for future years. Since he doesn't need to sell animals or milk to buy grain, the herd is able to grow relatively fast. Hamidou's system is an example of the benefits of an integrated crop-livestock farming approach widely promoted by policy-makers in the Sahel.

However, it is a system that is highly vulnerable in the context of increasing climatic uncertainty and greater rainfall fluctuations. Global warming introduces extra tension into an already stressed way of life that could make a critical and negative difference. Over the last 20–30 years, Hamidou has become more and more 'sedentary'. He no longer takes his animals to more distant pastures and he has lost the contacts he used to have with families in other areas of Niger and Nigeria.

His farming system is heavily dependent on manure. In the event of a serious drought or a series of below-average years, Hamidou may find it difficult to save his animals as he has no obvious 'refuge area' and local pastures are increasingly rare due to the pressure of cultivation. The locust plague of 2004 added an extra burden on many farmers in Niger; aid agencies are warning that 2005 will be very difficult.

The loss of the herd would undermine Hamidou's farming system and livelihood. Livestock routes are blocked, the institutions managing access to resources are 'corrupted', and there is increasing competition over local resources.

His plans now are to diversify into other areas of economic activity, which are less dependent on the rains. Already two of his sons regularly go to Nigeria in the dry season to earn money as labourers. His nephews too earn money in this way and are planning to set up a small restaurant business in a nearby town. Hamidou is also thinking about buying land in a nearby irrigation scheme. He says he will wait to see what the future brings and whether God will answer his prayers for more rain.

Ethiopia and support for smallholder agriculture

Many of the approaches that constitute 'good development' also double as excellent techniques to adapt to the uncertainties of global warming. Smallholder farming in Ethiopia is a case in point. Ethiopia is crippled by unfavourable international trade rules, lack of rural roads and market access, unemployment, debt, and environmental degradation. Ten per cent of Ethiopia's annual income still goes on debt repayments – twice what it spends on healthcare each year and three million people have contracted the HIV virus. So, when the rains fail in Ethiopia there is nothing to fall back on.

(Continues…)



Excerpted from "Africa – Up in Smoke?"
by .
Copyright © 2005 NEF.
Excerpted by permission of New Economic Foundation.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

Table of Contents

Foreword
Introduction, summary and recommendation
Food, farming and the environment
Water, drought and the changing rains
Health
Energy
Disasters
Gender
Migration
Conflict
Official development policy and climate change
Endnotes

From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews