Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965

From World War I to Operation Desert Storm, American policymakers have repeatedly invoked the "lessons of history" as they contemplated taking their nation to war. Do these historical analogies actually shape policy, or are they primarily tools of political justification? Yuen Foong Khong argues that leaders use analogies not merely to justify policies but also to perform specific cognitive and information-processing tasks essential to political decision-making. Khong identifies what these tasks are and shows how they can be used to explain the U.S. decision to intervene in Vietnam. Relying on interviews with senior officials and on recently declassified documents, the author demonstrates with a precision not attained by previous studies that the three most important analogies of the Vietnam era--Korea, Munich, and Dien Bien Phu--can account for America's Vietnam choices. A special contribution is the author's use of cognitive social psychology to support his argument about how humans analogize and to explain why policymakers often use analogies poorly.

"1121669638"
Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965

From World War I to Operation Desert Storm, American policymakers have repeatedly invoked the "lessons of history" as they contemplated taking their nation to war. Do these historical analogies actually shape policy, or are they primarily tools of political justification? Yuen Foong Khong argues that leaders use analogies not merely to justify policies but also to perform specific cognitive and information-processing tasks essential to political decision-making. Khong identifies what these tasks are and shows how they can be used to explain the U.S. decision to intervene in Vietnam. Relying on interviews with senior officials and on recently declassified documents, the author demonstrates with a precision not attained by previous studies that the three most important analogies of the Vietnam era--Korea, Munich, and Dien Bien Phu--can account for America's Vietnam choices. A special contribution is the author's use of cognitive social psychology to support his argument about how humans analogize and to explain why policymakers often use analogies poorly.

41.49 In Stock
Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965

Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965

by Yuen Foong Khong
Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965

Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965

by Yuen Foong Khong

eBook

$41.49  $55.00 Save 25% Current price is $41.49, Original price is $55. You Save 25%.

Available on Compatible NOOK devices, the free NOOK App and in My Digital Library.
WANT A NOOK?  Explore Now

Related collections and offers


Overview

From World War I to Operation Desert Storm, American policymakers have repeatedly invoked the "lessons of history" as they contemplated taking their nation to war. Do these historical analogies actually shape policy, or are they primarily tools of political justification? Yuen Foong Khong argues that leaders use analogies not merely to justify policies but also to perform specific cognitive and information-processing tasks essential to political decision-making. Khong identifies what these tasks are and shows how they can be used to explain the U.S. decision to intervene in Vietnam. Relying on interviews with senior officials and on recently declassified documents, the author demonstrates with a precision not attained by previous studies that the three most important analogies of the Vietnam era--Korea, Munich, and Dien Bien Phu--can account for America's Vietnam choices. A special contribution is the author's use of cognitive social psychology to support his argument about how humans analogize and to explain why policymakers often use analogies poorly.


Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780691212913
Publisher: Princeton University Press
Publication date: 05/05/2020
Sold by: Barnes & Noble
Format: eBook
Pages: 304
File size: 2 MB

Table of Contents

List of Figures and Tables
Acknowledgments
Abbreviations
Pt. IThe Argument
Ch. 1Analogical Reasoning in Foreign Affairs: Two Views3
Ch. 2The AE Framework19
Ch. 3America's Vietnam Options47
Pt. IIThe Cases
Ch. 4Containment, Analogies, and the Pre-1965 Vietnam Decisions71
Ch. 5Korea97
Ch. 6Dien Bien Phu148
Ch. 7Munich and the 1930s174
Pt. IIIThe Implications
Ch. 8The Psychology of Analogical Reasoning209
Ch. 9Conclusion251
Bibliography265
Index279

From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews