From the Publisher
"With this book, Kevin Dutton, has provided simplifying, clarifying, and essential insights into the character of human choice and decision-making. You'll not think about thinking the same way afterward." —Robert Cialdini, Author of Influence and Pre-Suasion
"Kevin Dutton has the great gift of being able to see patterns in human behaviour . . . He talks about his discoveries, and about their implications for all of us, with the flair and clarity of a practised storyteller. Fascinating, important, and entirely convincing." —Philip Pullman
"Kevin Dutton is a Special Forces-style psychologist. Daring. Original. All action. No nonsense." —Sir Ranulph Fiennes
Kirkus Reviews
2020-10-21
Why do we think in binary terms like “us versus them”? Research psychologist Dutton finds an answer in how our brains have—and haven’t—evolved.
Intentionally or not, the author, who has spent the last 20 years teaching at Oxford and Cambridge, puts his own spin on Malcolm Gladwell’s crowd-pleasing approach to pop psychology: dusting off scientific research, gathering anecdotes, reaching counterintuitive conclusions, and tossing in a dash of self-help. Dutton asserts that millions of years ago, the fight-or-flight response arose in response to perceived threats, and while the world has grown infinitely more complex, we’re still “programmed to think in black and white.” In order to navigate life, we mentally divide our experiences into manageable categories, giving them handy “frames.” Dutton argues that some cognitive “super-frames” are especially important. Along with “fight versus flight,” they include “us versus them” and “right versus wrong.” This cognitive trinity, he believes, helps to explain a vast range of polarizing events—e.g., Brexit, Trumpism, the rise of the Islamic State group. Those “super-frames” also hold the key to “supersuasion,” or “the secret science of getting what you want” from others. Casting a wide net, Dutton makes his case by drawing on research in neuroscience and other fields as well as on interviews with Tony Blair, Olympic gold medalist Sebastian Coe, transgender boxing manager Kellie Maloney, and others. That journalistic approach keeps the book from becoming dauntingly wonky but also serves as a substitute for a more rigorously scientific treatment that might have lent more plausibility to the author’s broad arguments and more weight to theories of “supersuasion,” which are no more compelling than those in many sales and marketing bestsellers. Gladwell’s detractors have often praised his storytelling and deft phrase-turning while faulting his tendency to oversell his theories and cherry-pick his academic studies. In Dutton’s book, many readers will find the same virtues and limits.
A theory about why people hold either/or views that’s more colorful than convincing.