Harvard Law Review's May 2016 issue, Number 7, features these contents:
• Article, "The Positive Law Model of the Fourth Amendment," by William Baude and James Y. Stern
• Essay, "Deference and Due Process," by Adrian Vermeule
• Book Review, "How to Explain Things with Force," by Mark Greenberg
• Note, "Free Speech Doctrine After Reed v. Town of Gilbert"
Furthermore, student commentary analyzes Recent Cases on the Affordable Care Act and the origination clause; statutory interpretation and the Video Privacy Protection Act; and commercial speech doctrine and the FDA's power to prosecute nonmisleading statements after modifying text. Other commentary examines South Carolina's legislative effort to to disqualify companies who support BDS from receiving state contracts; and the NLRB's adjudicative ruling to classify canvassers as employees, not independent contractors. Finally, the issue includes several brief comments on Recent Publications.
The Harvard Law Review is offered in a quality digital edition, featuring active Contents, linked footnotes, active URLs, legible tables, and proper ebook and Bluebook formatting. The Review is a student-run organization whose primary purpose is to publish a journal of legal scholarship. It comes out monthly from November through June and has roughly 2500 pages per volume. Student editors make all editorial and organizational decisions. This is the seventh issue of academic year 2015-2016.
