Invisible Sovereign: Imagining Public Opinion from the Revolution to Reconstruction
How has the idea of public opinion changed since the Revolutionary War—and how has it shaped the nation?

In the early American republic, the concept of public opinion was a recent—and ambiguous—invention. While appearing to promise a new style and system of democratic and deliberative politics, the concept was also invoked to limit self-rule, cement traditional prejudices and hierarchies, forestall deliberation, and marginalize dissent. As Americans contested the meaning of this essentially contestable idea, they expanded and contracted the horizons of political possibility and renegotiated the terms of political legitimacy.

Tracing the notion of public opinion from its late eighteenth-century origins to the Gilded Age, Mark G. Schmeller’s Invisible Sovereign argues that public opinion is a central catalyst in the history of American political thought. Schmeller treats it as a contagious idea that infected a broad range of discourses and practices in powerful, occasionally ironic, and increasingly contentious ways.

Ranging across a wide variety of historical fields, Invisible Sovereign traces a shift over time from early “political-constitutional” concepts, which identified public opinion with a sovereign people and wrapped it in the language of constitutionalism, to more modern, “social-psychological” concepts, which defined public opinion as a product of social action and mass communication.

"1122849985"
Invisible Sovereign: Imagining Public Opinion from the Revolution to Reconstruction
How has the idea of public opinion changed since the Revolutionary War—and how has it shaped the nation?

In the early American republic, the concept of public opinion was a recent—and ambiguous—invention. While appearing to promise a new style and system of democratic and deliberative politics, the concept was also invoked to limit self-rule, cement traditional prejudices and hierarchies, forestall deliberation, and marginalize dissent. As Americans contested the meaning of this essentially contestable idea, they expanded and contracted the horizons of political possibility and renegotiated the terms of political legitimacy.

Tracing the notion of public opinion from its late eighteenth-century origins to the Gilded Age, Mark G. Schmeller’s Invisible Sovereign argues that public opinion is a central catalyst in the history of American political thought. Schmeller treats it as a contagious idea that infected a broad range of discourses and practices in powerful, occasionally ironic, and increasingly contentious ways.

Ranging across a wide variety of historical fields, Invisible Sovereign traces a shift over time from early “political-constitutional” concepts, which identified public opinion with a sovereign people and wrapped it in the language of constitutionalism, to more modern, “social-psychological” concepts, which defined public opinion as a product of social action and mass communication.

52.0 In Stock
Invisible Sovereign: Imagining Public Opinion from the Revolution to Reconstruction

Invisible Sovereign: Imagining Public Opinion from the Revolution to Reconstruction

by Mark G. Schmeller
Invisible Sovereign: Imagining Public Opinion from the Revolution to Reconstruction

Invisible Sovereign: Imagining Public Opinion from the Revolution to Reconstruction

by Mark G. Schmeller

Hardcover

$52.00 
  • SHIP THIS ITEM
    Qualifies for Free Shipping
  • PICK UP IN STORE
    Check Availability at Nearby Stores

Related collections and offers


Overview

How has the idea of public opinion changed since the Revolutionary War—and how has it shaped the nation?

In the early American republic, the concept of public opinion was a recent—and ambiguous—invention. While appearing to promise a new style and system of democratic and deliberative politics, the concept was also invoked to limit self-rule, cement traditional prejudices and hierarchies, forestall deliberation, and marginalize dissent. As Americans contested the meaning of this essentially contestable idea, they expanded and contracted the horizons of political possibility and renegotiated the terms of political legitimacy.

Tracing the notion of public opinion from its late eighteenth-century origins to the Gilded Age, Mark G. Schmeller’s Invisible Sovereign argues that public opinion is a central catalyst in the history of American political thought. Schmeller treats it as a contagious idea that infected a broad range of discourses and practices in powerful, occasionally ironic, and increasingly contentious ways.

Ranging across a wide variety of historical fields, Invisible Sovereign traces a shift over time from early “political-constitutional” concepts, which identified public opinion with a sovereign people and wrapped it in the language of constitutionalism, to more modern, “social-psychological” concepts, which defined public opinion as a product of social action and mass communication.


Product Details

ISBN-13: 9781421418704
Publisher: Johns Hopkins University Press
Publication date: 02/15/2016
Series: New Studies in American Intellectual and Cultural History
Pages: 256
Product dimensions: 6.00(w) x 8.90(h) x 0.80(d)
Age Range: 18 Years

About the Author

Mark G. Schmeller is an associate professor of history at Syracuse University.

Table of Contents

Acknowledgments ix

Introduction Public Opinion and the American Political Imagination 1

Chapter 1 The Moral Economy of Opinion 7

Chapter 2 Credit and the Political Economy of Opinion 35

Chapter 3 Partisan Manufactories of Public Sentiment 60

Chapter 4 The Importance of Having Opinions 89

Chapter 5 The Fatal Force of Public Opinion 116

Chapter 6 Irrepressible Conflicts, Impending Crises 144

Conclusion Corn-Pone Opinions 171

Notes 181

Essay on Sources 223

Index 233

What People are Saying About This

From the Publisher

An impressive and edifying contribution to the history of early national and antebellum American political thought. Invisible Sovereign is eloquent, witty, deeply researched, and attuned to the significant and interesting features of the many sources it analyzes and the issues it raises.
—David M. Henkin, University of California, Berkeley, author of City Reading: Written Words and Public Spaces in Antebellum New York

David M. Henkin

An impressive and edifying contribution to the history of early national and antebellum American political thought. Invisible Sovereign is eloquent, witty, deeply researched, and attuned to the significant and interesting features of the many sources it analyzes and the issues it raises.

From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews