Reproductive Laws for the 1990s
The Project on Reproductive Laws for the 1990s began in 1985 with the realization that reports of scientific developments and new technologies were stimulating debates and discussions among bioethicists and policymakers, and that women had little part in those discussions either as participants or as a group with interests to be considered. With the help of a planning grant from the Rutgers University Institute for Research on Women, the Women's Rights Litigation Clinic at Rutgers University Law School-Newark held a planning meeting that June attended by approximately 20 theorists and activists in the area of reproductive rights. Project purposes, methods, and general shape took form at the meeting. Two goals have characterized the Project's work since then: first, to generate discussion, debate, and, where possible, consensus among those committed to reproductive autonomy and gender equality as to how best to respond to the questions raised by re­ ported advances in reproductive and neonatal technology and new modes of reproduction; and second, to ensure that those shaping reproductive law and policy appreciate the ramifications of these developments for gender equality. In meeting this twofold agenda, the Project focused on six areas: time limits on abortion; prenatal screening; fetus as patient; reproductive hazards in the workplace; interference with reproductive choice; and alternative modes of reproduction. The Project identified individuals to take respon­ sibility for drafting model legislation and position papers in the six areas (for the drafters, see the Appendix).
"1101313470"
Reproductive Laws for the 1990s
The Project on Reproductive Laws for the 1990s began in 1985 with the realization that reports of scientific developments and new technologies were stimulating debates and discussions among bioethicists and policymakers, and that women had little part in those discussions either as participants or as a group with interests to be considered. With the help of a planning grant from the Rutgers University Institute for Research on Women, the Women's Rights Litigation Clinic at Rutgers University Law School-Newark held a planning meeting that June attended by approximately 20 theorists and activists in the area of reproductive rights. Project purposes, methods, and general shape took form at the meeting. Two goals have characterized the Project's work since then: first, to generate discussion, debate, and, where possible, consensus among those committed to reproductive autonomy and gender equality as to how best to respond to the questions raised by re­ ported advances in reproductive and neonatal technology and new modes of reproduction; and second, to ensure that those shaping reproductive law and policy appreciate the ramifications of these developments for gender equality. In meeting this twofold agenda, the Project focused on six areas: time limits on abortion; prenatal screening; fetus as patient; reproductive hazards in the workplace; interference with reproductive choice; and alternative modes of reproduction. The Project identified individuals to take respon­ sibility for drafting model legislation and position papers in the six areas (for the drafters, see the Appendix).
54.99 In Stock
Reproductive Laws for the 1990s

Reproductive Laws for the 1990s

by Sherrill Cohen, Nadine Taub
Reproductive Laws for the 1990s

Reproductive Laws for the 1990s

by Sherrill Cohen, Nadine Taub

Paperback(Softcover reprint of the original 1st ed. 1989)

$54.99 
  • SHIP THIS ITEM
    Qualifies for Free Shipping
  • PICK UP IN STORE
    Check Availability at Nearby Stores

Related collections and offers


Overview

The Project on Reproductive Laws for the 1990s began in 1985 with the realization that reports of scientific developments and new technologies were stimulating debates and discussions among bioethicists and policymakers, and that women had little part in those discussions either as participants or as a group with interests to be considered. With the help of a planning grant from the Rutgers University Institute for Research on Women, the Women's Rights Litigation Clinic at Rutgers University Law School-Newark held a planning meeting that June attended by approximately 20 theorists and activists in the area of reproductive rights. Project purposes, methods, and general shape took form at the meeting. Two goals have characterized the Project's work since then: first, to generate discussion, debate, and, where possible, consensus among those committed to reproductive autonomy and gender equality as to how best to respond to the questions raised by re­ ported advances in reproductive and neonatal technology and new modes of reproduction; and second, to ensure that those shaping reproductive law and policy appreciate the ramifications of these developments for gender equality. In meeting this twofold agenda, the Project focused on six areas: time limits on abortion; prenatal screening; fetus as patient; reproductive hazards in the workplace; interference with reproductive choice; and alternative modes of reproduction. The Project identified individuals to take respon­ sibility for drafting model legislation and position papers in the six areas (for the drafters, see the Appendix).

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780896031753
Publisher: Springer-Verlag New York, LLC
Publication date: 12/23/1988
Series: Contemporary Issues in Biomedicine, Ethics, and Society
Edition description: Softcover reprint of the original 1st ed. 1989
Pages: 472
Product dimensions: 5.98(w) x 9.02(h) x 0.04(d)

Table of Contents

I. The Social Context for Reproductive Laws.- Introduction, Working Group of the Project on Reproductive Laws for the 1990s.- II. Reproduction and Access to Health Care: A Legislator’s View.- Reproduction and Access to Health Care.- III. Society and Reproduction.- Reproductive Laws, Women of Color, and Low-Income Women.- Reproductive Technology and Disability.- IV. Reproductive Policy Position Papers and Commentaries for the 1990s.- 1. Prenatal and Neonatal Technology, Abortion, and Birth.- Position Paper: Time Limits on Abortion.- Position Paper: Prenatal Screening.- Position Paper: Fetus as Patient.- Commentary: “Hard Cases” and Reproductive Rights.- Commentary: Disability Rights Perspectives on Reproductive Technologies and Public Policy.- Commentary: The Fetus Is a Patient.- Commentary: Reconciling Offspring and Maternal Interests during Pregnancy.- 2. Reproductive Choice: Hazards and Interference.- Position Paper: Reproductive Hazards in the Workplace.- Position Paper: Interference with Reproductive Choice.- Commentary: An Attorney General’s Outlook.- Commentary: The View from Capitol Hill.- Commentary: Protective Legislation and Occupational Hazards: Flawed Science and Poor Policies.- Commentary: A Model for Advocacy: From Proposals to Policy.- 3. Alternative Forms of Reproduction.- Position Paper: Alternative Modes of Reproduction.- Position Paper: Alternative Modes of Reproduction: Other Views and Questions.- Commentary: Regulating the New Reproductive Technologies.- Commentary: Alternative Modes of Reproduction: The Locus and Determinants of Choice.- Commentary: The Key Social Issues Posed by the New Reproductive Technologies: A Physician’s Perspective.- Working Group.- Advisory Committee.- Notes on Contributors.- Table of Cases.
From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews