A freshly original reading of Rousseau without ‘doing’ anything to him (i.e., distorting or perverting him just to put him in a ‘new light’). Among other strengths, this book contains the fullest and most important treatment in the English language of a crucial Rousseauean distinction—that between amour de soi and amour-propre.”
—Patrick Riley,University of Wisconsin, Madison
“An excellent and thorough study of the concept of Nature in Rousseau’s political philosophy, this book will be of great value to all interested in Rousseau, whether philosophers, political theorists, or French literature specialists.”
—Guillaume Ansart Utopian Studies
“This study is a valuable contribution to our understanding of Rousseau and to modern thought more generally. The book is engaging and Cooper’s focus on the psychological element of Rousseau’s thought—both the structure of the psyche and Rousseau’s concern with healthy psyches—strikes me as instructive and appropriate.”
—John T. Scott Review of Politics
“Laurence Cooper’s book is an important contribution to Rousseau scholarship and an analysis that will be illuminating and thought-provoking for anyone who takes seriously the problems of modern man and political philosophy.
Laurence Cooper has offered a well-written, carefully argued, thought-provoking account of Rousseau’s understanding of the primitive basis for the natural goodness of civil man and the relation between amour de soi and amour-propre.”
—Paul E. Kirkland Review of Metaphysics
“Making a self-assured debut, Laurence Cooper declares: ‘If my interpretation is propelled by a single question, the question of the good life, it is also dominated by a single theme,’ that of ‘the concept of nature.’ He links the ‘question’ to the ‘theme’ via the idea of ‘existence.’ The connection is established thus: ‘the measure of the good life . . . is existence, for existence . . . is prior to happiness in two senses. . . . First, it is the very substance . . . of happiness; and second, it can be attained—and can thereby give meaning and quality to life—quite apart from happiness.’ . . . The ideas of conscience and amour-propre are important in Cooper’s exposition. He presents Rousseau’s scattered comments on conscience with clarity and insight, distilling their essence without discounting the varied nuances of texts written at different times, in different contexts. . . . The most original part of Cooper’s book is his treatment of existence. The idea is that an individual can have a higher or a lower level of existence, the level being measured on both quantitative and qualitative scales.”
—Timothy O'Hagan International Studies in Philosophy
