In the seventeenth century antiquarianism was a well-respected profession and antiquarian works were in demand, particularly amongst the gentry, who were especially interested in establishing lineage and the descent of land tenure. Although intended primarily as a source of information about who owned what and where, they often contained fascinating descriptions of the English landscape. Charles Lancaster has examined the town and county surveys of this period and selected the most interesting examples to illustrate the variety and richness of these depictions. Organised by region, he has provided detailed introductions to each excerpt. Including such writers as John Stow, William Dugdale, Elias Ashmole, Daniel Defoe, Gilbert White and Celia Fiennes, this is a book that will appeal to anyone with an interest in both national and local history and to lovers of English scenery.
In the seventeenth century antiquarianism was a well-respected profession and antiquarian works were in demand, particularly amongst the gentry, who were especially interested in establishing lineage and the descent of land tenure. Although intended primarily as a source of information about who owned what and where, they often contained fascinating descriptions of the English landscape. Charles Lancaster has examined the town and county surveys of this period and selected the most interesting examples to illustrate the variety and richness of these depictions. Organised by region, he has provided detailed introductions to each excerpt. Including such writers as John Stow, William Dugdale, Elias Ashmole, Daniel Defoe, Gilbert White and Celia Fiennes, this is a book that will appeal to anyone with an interest in both national and local history and to lovers of English scenery.
eBook
Available on Compatible NOOK devices, the free NOOK App and in My Digital Library.
Related collections and offers
Overview
In the seventeenth century antiquarianism was a well-respected profession and antiquarian works were in demand, particularly amongst the gentry, who were especially interested in establishing lineage and the descent of land tenure. Although intended primarily as a source of information about who owned what and where, they often contained fascinating descriptions of the English landscape. Charles Lancaster has examined the town and county surveys of this period and selected the most interesting examples to illustrate the variety and richness of these depictions. Organised by region, he has provided detailed introductions to each excerpt. Including such writers as John Stow, William Dugdale, Elias Ashmole, Daniel Defoe, Gilbert White and Celia Fiennes, this is a book that will appeal to anyone with an interest in both national and local history and to lovers of English scenery.
Product Details
| ISBN-13: | 9780752475486 |
|---|---|
| Publisher: | The History Press |
| Publication date: | 11/08/2011 |
| Sold by: | Barnes & Noble |
| Format: | eBook |
| Pages: | 288 |
| File size: | 890 KB |
| Age Range: | 12 Years |
Read an Excerpt
Seeing England
Antiquaries, Travellers & Naturalists
By Charles Lancaster
The History Press
Copyright © 2011 Charles LancasterAll rights reserved.
ISBN: 978-0-7524-7548-6
CHAPTER 1
Kent: William Lambarde (1536–1601)
Amongst the antiquarian writers of early modern descriptions of English counties, William Lambarde holds a special place as the author of the first such work to be published, A Perambulation of Kent. It was an immediate success, and for more than a century after its publication it was referred to by subsequent antiquaries as a model of its genre. It established a method for topological description and, combining this with historical accounts of places, was a clear example of the chorographical approach, which was the basis of antiquarian surveys for the next hundred and fifty years. While Lambarde's abiding interest was Anglo-Saxon history and culture, he was by profession a lawyer, and, as might be expected, his view of the county was to some extent administrative, and to a more considerable extent historical.
Lambarde was born in London in October, 1536, and died in August, 1601, at his manor, Westcombe, in Greenwich, Kent, which he had inherited from his father in 1554. He was admitted to Lincoln's Inn in 1556, but was not called to the bar until 1567. This lengthy career development was no doubt due to his pursuit of Anglo-Saxon studies, which research he undertook with Laurence Nowell until the latter's departure for France in 1567. Lambarde's first published work was Archaionomia, a collection of paraphrased Anglo-Saxon laws, in 1568. The idea for this work was probably Nowell's originally, but it was Lambarde who did the bulk of the translating and writing. His next antiquarian work, not published in his lifetime, was entitled Alphabetical Description of the Chief Places of England and Wales. It was a collection of personal observations on places, together with transcripts taken from chronicles and ancient documents.
The first draft of A Perambulation ofKent was completed in 1570, but before submitting his work to print, Lambarde sought the services of a former sheriff of Kent, Thomas Wotton, as a first reader. While this suggests that he wanted to check the accuracy of his data, perhaps also he felt that his work would benefit from the support of a native of the county. As was the practice of the time, Lambarde circulated his manuscript amongst certain friends, one of whom was Matthew Parker, then Archbishop of Canterbury, who in 1573 brought it to the attention of Lord Burghley, the Lord Treasurer and chief adviser to Queen Elizabeth. Whatever encouragement Lambarde may have had, publication was nevertheless delayed further till 1576, perhaps because of personal circumstances during that time: Lambarde's first wife died, and he founded an almshouse. But when the book appeared, it was well received, so much so that he brought out an expanded version in 1596, and, later, there were subsequent editions in the seventeenth century, and the second edition was reprinted, with a biography of the author, in 1826.
His subsequent antiquarian research was confined to legal topics. In 1581 he published Eirenarcha, or of the Office of Justices of the Peace, which was reprinted seven times between 1582 and 1610, the last three with additions. Archeion; or, a Commentary upon the High Courts of Justice in England, appeared in 1591. The official posts held and responsibilities taken on by Lambarde in the course of his career included: 1579, bencher of Lincoln's Inn; 1579, Justice of the Peace for Kent; 1592, Master in Chancery; 1597, Keeper of the Records at the Rolls Chapel; 1597, trustee to Lord Cobham for the establishment of a college for the poor; and 1601, Keeper of the Records in the Tower. In this last capacity he had a private audience with Queen Elizabeth on 4 August, to present her with his new catalogue of the documents. It was in this meeting that Elizabeth famously referred to the recent conspiracy of the Earl of Essex with the remark, 'I am Richard II, know ye not that?' The meeting was a high point of the antiquary's career, the queen praising him as 'good and Honest Lambarde'. It was just two weeks before his death.
Lambarde's antiquarian interest is the first of many cases in which we will see a close association with a legal career. The collection of details about the past, especially with respect to the land and its administration, is of a forensic nature, and clearly leads to the development of resources invaluable for the pursuits both of litigation and constitutional interpretation. Moreover, Lambarde was a member of a circle of scholarly Elizabethan men with a Renaissance outlook. Together with Lawrence Nowell, and under the patronage of William Cecil, he planned the writing of descriptions of all the counties of the nation. Indeed, his original intention had been to write a topography of the whole of Great Britain, but, as he stated in his closing remarks at the end of the book, the composition of a survey of his own county had made him realise that a collaborative effort would be more realistic:
As touching the description of the residue of this Realme, finding by this one, how harde it will be for any one (and much more for my selfe) to accomplish it for all, I can but wish in like sort, that some one in eachShyre woulde make the enterprise for his owne Countrie, to the end that by joyning our Pennes, and conferring our labours (as it were, ex symbolo) we might at the last by the union of many partes and papers compact one whole and perfect bodie and booke of our English Topographie.
By the time his book was to be published, he added to this remark, taking account of the fact that his friend William Camden was indeed proceeding on a such a project as he had envisaged.
Here left I (good Reader) when I first set foorth this Woorke: Since which time I finde my desire not a little served by Master Camdens Britannia: wherein, as he hath not onely farre exceeded whatsoever hath been formerly attempted in that kynd, but hath also passed the expectation of other men & even his own hope: So do I acknowledge it written to the great Honour of the realme with men abroad & to the singular delight of us all at home, having for mine own particular found my self thereby to have learned much even in that Shyre wherein I had endevoured to know most. Neverthelesse, being assured that the Inwardes of each place may best be knowen by such as reside therein, I can not but still encourage some one able man in each Shyre to undertake his owne, whereby both many good particularities will come to discoverie every where, and Master Camden him selfe may yet have greater choice wherewith to amplifie and enlarge the whole.
Thus Lambarde's Perambulation of Kent and Camden's Britannia could complement each other: the former, a model for a series of county studies written by dwellers in each county; the latter, a comprehensive view of the whole realm.
The emergence of such projects in Elizabethan England is not surprising. Italian and French humanists had long been writing chorographically about their countries' historical monuments and the investigations of John Leland in England had shown that, even if it was no longer possible to believe that the founder of the nation was Brutus of Troy, there was nevertheless evidence of a distant and glorious past. A description of the country would be an affirmation of national identity based on the continuation of governance and laws, on the identification of antique origins and on the discovery of associations with the classical world. While Camden chose to give emphasis to Britain's period as a Roman province, Lambarde was concerned with both Anglo-Saxon heritage and the present. The earlier work, Archaionomia, was a pioneering essay into Anglo-Saxon research, the significance of which was the affirmation of the antiquity and continuity of institutions since pre-conquest times. In particular, the English church could be shown to have preceded the Roman church in the nation.
The characterisation of his book as a Perambulation was apt, for it is a true chorography, in that description and history are called upon as the county is traversed topologically. The principal framework is place, and the ad hoc historical passages are incidental. This is not to say that the history is of secondary importance, but rather that it is called up in the narrative as a subsequence of location. Little of Lambarde's history is specifically concerned with county families, so that genealogy and lineage are not prominent in this first of the county surveys in the manner which they assume in the mid-seventeenth century. Dealing firstly with the county as a whole, Lambarde gives a general description and history, with certain facts regarding administration, markets, and notable houses and institutions. He then begins his 'perambulation', taking the two sees of Canterbury and Rochester in turn and describing each of their important localities individually. In each of these descriptions, the main features of the place are outlined, together with relevant significant historical events or developments. Frequently these points are concerned with religious foundations, great houses, important historical figures or noteworthy royal charters, but they may also provide information about produce, for example that the Isle of Sheppey's name derives from its abundance of sheep. Finally, in a section headed 'The Customes of Kent', is a discussion of the county's unique system of land tenure, gavelkind, a topic of which the author had specialist knowledge.
In the text as a whole, Lambarde seems to have pursued as his main purpose the identification, mainly through historical accounts, of Kent as an individual county, and as a significant constituent part of the nation. It emerges principally as an administrative entity with a noble history. As for scenery and the ordinary people, there are only fleeting glimpses, yet it is nevertheless possible to sense that the author belongs this county, and has a love for it. The absence of landscape as a feature of the county suggests not that it was not noticed, nor even that it was not loved, but that it was, to sixteenth-century eyes, unremarkable. Unlike the crops, the churches, the traditions, it had no impact on the life of the people; it was simply there.
The first of the following extracts is from the general description of the county, which clearly provided guidance to later chorographical writers. He begins with a specification of the county's location and size and a discussion of the etymology of its name. After stating how it is divided administratively, Lambarde then comments on the 'air' (we would now think of this more as the weather) and the 'soil', and then crops, stock, and other produce, and the rivers and the sea. Following this, but not included here, comes a discussion on the classes of people. These several headings under which a county could be characterised came to be used in many subsequent county descriptions. Lambarde had, of course, himself become a man of Kent, and there is a certain degree of pleasure evident as he undertakes the task of relating its features. The details of the various towns and parishes were based on the chorographical template which also became a model for county descriptions for decades to come. The extract dealing with Tenham is, however, a little different, and is offered as an example of the author describing the countryside. It was the special beauty of this part of the county, he explained, which provoked a departure from his usual approach.
The Estate of Kent
From A Perambulation of Kent, 1596, pp.8–12
Kent ..., lying in the southeast region of this realme, hath on the North the river of Thamise, on the East the Sea, on the South the Sea and Sussex, and on the West Sussex and Surrey. It extendeth in length, from the West of the landes in Beckenham, called (I will not say, purposely hereof) Langley, where is the stile, as it were, over into Surrey, to the Ramsgate in the Isle of Thanet, about fiftie and three Myles: and reacheth in breadthe from the River Rother on the South of Newendene next Sussex, to the river of Thamise, at Nowrheade in the Isle of Greane, twentie sixe Miles, and somewhat more; And hath in circuit 160. Miles, or thereabouts.
It is called by Cæsar, and other auncient writers, Cancium, and Cancia in Latin; which name (as I make conjecture) was framed either out of Cainc, a woord that (in the language of the Britaines, whom Cæsar at his arrivall founde inhabiting there) signifieth, Bowghes, or woods, and was imposed, by reason that this countrie, both at that time, and also long after, was in manner wholy overgrowne with woode, as it shall hereafter in fit place more plainly appeare: or else, of Cant, or Canton, which denoteth an Angle, or Corner of land, (so this and sundry others bee) as Master Camden the most lightsome Antiquarie of this age hath observed.
The whole Shyre hath long been, and is at this day, divided into five partes, communly called Lathes, not altogither equall: which also be broken into Hundrethes, and they againe parted into townes and borowes, most aptly for assemblie and administration of Justice.
The Aire in Kent, by reason that the Countrye is on sundry partes bordered with water, is somewhat thicke: for which cause (as also for that it is scituate neerest to the Sunne risinge and furthest from the North pole of any part of the realme) it is temperate, not so colde by a great deale as Northumberland, and yet in maner as warme as Cornwall. It hath also the better side of the river of Thamise, from whence by the benefit of the South and Southwest windes, (most common in this region) the fog and mist is carried from it.
The Soile is for the most parte bountifull, consisting indifferently of arable, pasture, meadow and woodland: howbeit of these, wood occupieth the greatest portion even till this day, except it be towards the East, which coast is more champaigne than the residue.
It hath Corne and Graine, common with other Shyres of the Realme; as Wheat, Rye, Barly, and Oats, in good plenty, save onely, that in the Wealdish, or wooddy places, where of late daies they used much Pomage, or Cider for want of Barley, now that lacke is more commonly supplied with Oates.
Neither wanteth Kent such sorts of pulce, as the rest of the Realme yeeldeth, namely beanes, peason, and tares,which some (reteining the sounde of the Latine woord Vicia) call vetches, and which Polydor supposed not to be found in Ingland.
The pasture and meadowe, is not onely sufficient in proportion to the quantitie of the country itselfe for breeding, but is comparable in fertilitie also to any other that is neare it, in so much that it gayneth by feeding.
In fertile and fruitfull woodes and trees, this Country is most florishing also, whether you respect the mast of Oke, Beeche and Chesten for cattaile: or the fruit of Apples, Peares, Cherries, and Plums for men: for besides great store of oke and beeche, it hath whole woodes that beare Chestnut, a mast (if I may so call it, and not rather a fruite, whereof even delicate persons disdaine not to feede) not commonly seene in other countries: But as for Ortchards of Apples, and Gardeins of Cheries, and those of the most delicious and exquisite kindes that can be, no part of the Realme (that I knowe) hath them, either in such quantitie and number, or with such arte and industrie, set and planted. So that the Kentish man, most truely of all, may say with him in Vergil,
Sunt nobis mitia poma, Castaneæ molles, &c.
Touching domestical cattel, as horses, mares, oxen, kine, and sheepe, Kent differeth not muche from others: onely this it challengeth as singular, that it bringeth forth the largest of stature in ech kinde of them: The like whereof also Polydore (in his historie) confesseth of the Kentish poultrie.
Parkes of fallow Deere, and games of graie Conies, it maintaineth many, the one for pleasure, & the other for profit, as it may well appeere by this, that within memorie almost the one halfe of the first sort be disparked, & the number of warreins continueth, if it do not increase daily.
As for red Deere, and blacke Conies, it nourisheth them not, as having no forests, or great walks of waste ground for the one, & not tarying the time to raise the gaine by the other: for, blacke conyes are kept partly for their skins, which have their season in Winter: and Kent by the neernesse to London, hath so quicke market of yoong Rabbets, that it killeth this game chiefely in summer.
There is no Mineral, or other profit digged out of the belly of the earth heere, save only that in certeine places they have Mines of Iron, quarreys of Paving stone, and pits of fat Marle.
(Continues...)
Excerpted from Seeing England by Charles Lancaster. Copyright © 2011 Charles Lancaster. Excerpted by permission of The History Press.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
Table of Contents
Contents
Title,Dedication,
Acknowledgements,
Introduction,
The South-East,
I Kent: William Lambarde (1536–1601),
II Canterbury: William Somner (1606–1669),
III Berkshire: Elias Ashmole (1617–1692),
IV Oxfordshire: Robert Plot (1640–1696),
The South-West,
V Wiltshire: John Aubrey (1626–1697),
VI Cornwall: Richard Carew (1555–1620),
VII Devon: Thomas Westcote (1567–1636),
London,
VIII London: John Stow (1525–1605),
IX Hertfordshire: Henry Chauncy (1633–1719),
X Seeing the World: The Tradescants,
West Midlands,
XI Warwickshire: William Dugdale (1605–1686),
XII Memorial Warwickshire: William Thomas,
XIII Myddle, Shropshire: Richard Gough (1634–1723),
XIV Albion — Warwickshire: Michael Drayton (1563–1631),
East Midlands,
XV Albion — Derbyshire: Michael Drayton,
XVI Stamford, Lincolnshire: Richard Butcher (1586/7–1664),
East Anglia,
XVII Norfolk: Thomas Browne (1605–1682) Yorkshire and the Humber,
XVIII York: Francis Drake (1696–1771),
XIX Yorkshire: William Bray (1736–1832) The North-West,
XX Cheshire: William Smith (c.1550–1618) and William Webb,
The North-East,
XXI Britannia — Northumberland: William Camden (1551–1623),
After Antiquarianism,
XXII Newcastle and Cumberland: Celia Fiennes (1662–1741),
XXIII Cambridgeshire: Daniel Defoe (1660–1731),
XXIV Cumberland and Westmorland: William Gilpin (1724–1804),
XXV Cornwall: William Borlase (1695–1772),
XXVI Selborne, Hampshire: Gilbert White (1720–1793),
Imagining England,
Bibliography,
Copyright,