The Choice of War: The Iraq War and the Just War Tradition

The Choice of War: The Iraq War and the Just War Tradition

by Albert L. Weeks
The Choice of War: The Iraq War and the Just War Tradition

The Choice of War: The Iraq War and the Just War Tradition

by Albert L. Weeks

Hardcover

$75.00 
  • SHIP THIS ITEM
    Qualifies for Free Shipping
  • PICK UP IN STORE
    Check Availability at Nearby Stores

Related collections and offers


Overview

A longtime scholar of the Cold War deftly weaves together the tradition of "just war" and an examination of current events to show how the time-honored concepts of jus ad bellum (justice of war) and jus in bello (justice in war) apply to the U.S. military involvement in Iraq.

This timely analysis of President George W. Bush's foreign policy deals with the cornerstone of his administrations—the "war on terror"—as implemented in Afghanistan, Iraq, Guantanamo Bay, and at Abu Ghraib prison. The Choice of War: The Iraq War and the "Just War" Tradition discusses NSS 2002, the national security statement that became the blueprint for the Bush Doctrine. It explains the differences and similarities between preventive and pre-emptive war and explores the administration's justification of the necessity of the March 2003 invasion. Finally, it analyzes the conduct of the war, the occupation, and the post-occupation phases of the conflict.

In evaluating the Bush Doctrine, both as declared strategy and as implemented, Albert L. Weeks asks whether going it virtually alone in the global struggle against 21st-century terrorism should be incorporated permanently into American political and military policy. Answering no, he suggests an alternative to a doctrine that has isolated the United States and left the world divided.


Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780275991111
Publisher: Bloomsbury Academic
Publication date: 11/25/2009
Series: Ethics of American Foreign Policy Series
Pages: 200
Product dimensions: 6.20(w) x 9.30(h) x 0.90(d)

About the Author

ALBERT L. WEEKS, formerly Professor of International Affairs at New York University (1961-1989), teaches politics and foreign policy at the Ringling School of Art and Design in Sarasota, Florida. A well-respected Sovietologist, he is the author of nine books, including Stalin's Other War: Soviet Grand Strategy, 1939-1941 (2003) and Russia's Life-Saver: Lend-Lease Aid to the USSR in World War II (2004).

Table of Contents

Preface vii

Introduction 1

Part I Jus Ad Bellum and Jus in Bello 7

Chapter 1 The Human Habit of War 9

Chapter 2 Judaeo-Christian to Modern Views of War 19

Part II Jus Ad Bellum and the Iraq War 39

Chapter 3 "Just Cause" and the Iraq War 41

Chapter 4 Legitimate Authority and the Iraq War 62

Chapter 5 Feasibility Criterion and the Iraq War 78

Part III Jus in Bello and the Iraq War 87

Chapter 6 Fatal Mistakes Made in the Iraq War 89

Chapter 7 Are the Laws of War Observed? 103

Chapter 8 Some Conclusions 112

Epilogue 134

Appendices 137

Notes 155

Bibliography 181

Index 187

What People are Saying About This

Nickolas PappaS Professor of Philosophy

"No sensationalism here; just plenty of informed critical reasoning. Albert Weeks moves with sure foot and clear eye through the tangle of moral, philosophical, and legal issues, the recent and less recent history, surrounding US actions in Iraq. His deepest vision is a hopeful one: democracy's citizens taking this opportunity to deliberate on how they want their country to behave, and for what reasons."

Larry R. Thompson President

"In this book, Dr. Albert Weeks cogently presents an analysis and a survey of the concepts for waging a 'justifiable war' versus an unjustifiable one. By tackling this important issue directly, Dr. Weeks’ book can serve to provide an antidote to initiating wars that fail to serve the national interests and violate moral principles."

Nickolas PappaSProfessor of Philosophy

"No sensationalism here; just plenty of informed critical reasoning. Albert Weeks moves with sure foot and clear eye through the tangle of moral, philosophical, and legal issues, the recent and less recent history, surrounding US actions in Iraq. His deepest vision is a hopeful one: democracy's citizens taking this opportunity to deliberate on how they want their country to behave, and for what reasons."

Dr. Dani Shoham Senior lecturer at the Dep. of Political Studies

"I was profoundly impressed by the objectivity of the writing about such a disputable subject, which for a long period of time has been judged and treated too subjectively, in a way considerably fueled by political bias, rather than a refined strategic outlook. And in this book I was pleased to find the correct perspective, presented professionally, comprehensively and soberly analyzed."

Dr. Douglas Chismar Chairman

" ''When it is not absolutely necessary to go to war, it is necessary not to.' This profound statement from the Introduction, an assertion that constitutes a breathtakingly subtle exercise in modal logic, illustrates the depth, intricacy, and importance of what this book undertakes. It would be foolish to attempt a judgment of the Iraq War's legitimacy while ignoring twenty-five centuries of debate and reflection concerning the moral dimensions of war. What is needed is a wise guide to these discussions who is attuned to their main themes and most potent contributions. Even better would be a commentator who can then pick through the complexities of the events and arguments leading up to the Iraq War, pressing to them the historic arguments and principles in a careful and critical manner. No better guide can be found than Al Weeks, a long-time student of the Cold War and a historian whose mind has been primed by the most important ideas of both the Eastern and Western traditions. Weeks is afraid neither of 'big ideas' nor minutiae of fact, and is thus well-qualified to help us penetrate through the fog of our most recent war."

Neil Marinovich Professor

"In his The Choice of War, Albert Weeks has avoided the pitfall of descending into polemics and partisan politics, while at the same time presenting an insightful critique of the American invasion of Iraq and of American policy regarding detainees. It is about time that an honest evaluation of American strategy and policy in Iraq is now available; this book is both timely and topical and is ideally suited for college students who want to better understand the current crisis that the United States still faces as we attempt to extricate ourselves from Iraq. Most admirably Mr. Weeks does not seek to chastise unnecessarily those responsible for our failed mission in Iraq, but rather he has provided us with a guidebook that can help our nation repair the damage to American honor and prestige that has arisen from our ill-conceived and ill-advised invasion of Iraq."

Neil Marinovich Professor, European and American History, Ringling College of Art and Design

Larry R. Thompson

President

"In this book, Dr. Albert Weeks cogently presents an analysis and a survey of the concepts for waging a 'justifiable war' versus an unjustifiable one. By tackling this important issue directly, Dr. Weeks' book can serve to provide an antidote to initiating wars that fail to serve the national interests and violate moral principles."

Larry R. Thompson

President, Ringling College of Art and Design

General Merrill A. McPeak

"Heisenberg famously said an 'expert' is someone who knows the worst mistakes that can be made in a particular field of activity, and how to avoid them. With this book, Albert Weeks shows he’s an expert, offering both a deadly accurate description of the shambles we made of the second Iraq War, and a healing prescription that is mandatory reading for everyone interested in national security.' "

Neil Marinovich Professor

"In his The Choice of War, Albert Weeks has avoided the pitfall of descending into polemics and partisan politics, while at the same time presenting an insightful critique of the American invasion of Iraq and of American policy regarding detainees. It is about time that an honest evaluation of American strategy and policy in Iraq is now available; this book is both timely and topical and is ideally suited for college students who want to better understand the current crisis that the United States still faces as we attempt to extricate ourselves from Iraq. Most admirably Mr. Weeks does not seek to chastise unnecessarily those responsible for our failed mission in Iraq, but rather he has provided us with a guidebook that can help our nation repair the damage to American honor and prestige that has arisen from our ill-conceived and ill-advised invasion of Iraq."

Dr. Douglas Chismar Chairman

''When it is not absolutely necessary to go to war, it is necessary not to.' This profound statement from the Introduction, an assertion that constitutes a breathtakingly subtle exercise in modal logic, illustrates the depth, intricacy, and importance of what this book undertakes. It would be foolish to attempt a judgment of the Iraq War's legitimacy while ignoring twenty-five centuries of debate and reflection concerning the moral dimensions of war. What is needed is a wise guide to these discussions who is attuned to their main themes and most potent contributions. Even better would be a commentator who can then pick through the complexities of the events and arguments leading up to the Iraq War, pressing to them the historic arguments and principles in a careful and critical manner. No better guide can be found than Al Weeks, a long-time student of the Cold War and a historian whose mind has been primed by the most important ideas of both the Eastern and Western traditions. Weeks is afraid neither of 'big ideas' nor minutiae of fact, and is thus well-qualified to help us penetrate through the fog of our most recent war."

Dr. Douglas Chismar Chairman, Departmant of Liberal Arts, Ringling College of Arts and Design

Dr. Dani Shoham Senior lecturer at the Dep. of Political Studies

"I was profoundly impressed by the objectivity of the writing about such a disputable subject, which for a long period of time has been judged and treated too subjectively, in a way considerably fueled by political bias, rather than a refined strategic outlook. And in this book I was pleased to find the correct perspective, presented professionally, comprehensively and soberly analyzed."

Dr. Dani Shoham Senior lecturer at the Dep. of Political Studies, Bar Ilan University, Israel

Rory Cooley

"As a student of Dr. Weeks’ for nearly two years, I was fascinated by his balanced insight into Operation Iraqi Freedom. I hoped he would expand on the topic in the form of a book. In this latest discourse he presents a compelling insight into the question of the justifiability of America’s entering into war and does so in a well articulated and understandable fashion."

General Merrill A. McPeak

"Heisenberg famously said an 'expert' is someone who knows the worst mistakes that can be made in a particular field of activity, and how to avoid them. With this book, Albert Weeks shows he's an expert, offering both a deadly accurate description of the shambles we made of the second Iraq War, and a healing prescription that is mandatory reading for everyone interested in national security."

General Merrill A. McPeak, USAF (Ret.)

Chief of Staff, 1990-1994

Nickolas PappasProfessor of Philosophy

"No sensationalism here; just plenty of informed critical reasoning. Albert Weeks moves with sure foot and clear eye through the tangle of moral, philosophical, and legal issues, the recent and less recent history, surrounding US actions in Iraq. His deepest vision is a hopeful one: democracy’s citizens taking this opportunity to deliberate on how they want their country to behave, and for what reasons."

Dr. Dani ShohamSenior lecturer at the Dep. of Political Studies

"I was profoundly impressed by the objectivity of the writing about such a disputable subject, which for a long period of time has been judged and treated too subjectively, in a way considerably fueled by political bias, rather than a refined strategic outlook. And in this book I was pleased to find the correct perspective, presented professionally, comprehensively and soberly analyzed."

Richard RaackEmeritus professor

"Dr. Albert Weeks gives readers a thoughtful set of criteria for which to weigh the pros and cons of starting war. The ancient just vs. unjust war criteria, appraised systematically by Weeks, are of vital importance in establishing the moral foundation in initiating any war. Discussion of these touchstones, when applied to the Iraq War begun by the U.S. in 2003, is especially timely. As the great military thinker Clausewitz wrote in Napoleonic times that the moral factor in waging war becomes the determining factor as a government decides on a policy of waging war against another state. Politics and war-making, Clausewitz emphasized, are intertwined. President Abraham Lincoln in the Civil War understood this connection. American presidents nowadays need the same wisdom.' "

Nickolas Pappas Professor of Philosophy

"No sensationalism here; just plenty of informed critical reasoning. Albert Weeks moves with sure foot and clear eye through the tangle of moral, philosophical, and legal issues, the recent and less recent history, surrounding US actions in Iraq. His deepest vision is a hopeful one: democracy's citizens taking this opportunity to deliberate on how they want their country to behave, and for what reasons."

Nickolas Pappas Professor of Philosophy, City University of New York and author of Guidebook to Plato and the Republic

Rory Cooley

"As a student of Dr. Weeks' for nearly two years, I was fascinated by his balanced insight into Operation Iraqi Freedom. I hoped he would expand on the topic in the form of a book. In this latest discourse he presents a compelling insight into the question of the justifiability of America's entering into war and does so in a well articulated and understandable fashion."

Rory Cooley, graduate, Ringling College of Art and Design

Dr. Douglas ChismarChairman

" ''When it is not absolutely necessary to go to war, it is necessary not to.' This profound statement from the Introduction, an assertion that constitutes a breathtakingly subtle exercise in modal logic, illustrates the depth, intricacy, and importance of what this book undertakes. It would be foolish to attempt a judgment of the Iraq War’s legitimacy while ignoring twenty-five centuries of debate and reflection concerning the moral dimensions of war. What is needed is a wise guide to these discussions who is attuned to their main themes and most potent contributions. Even better would be a commentator who can then pick through the complexities of the events and arguments leading up to the Iraq War, pressing to them the historic arguments and principles in a careful and critical manner. No better guide can be found than Al Weeks, a long-time student of the Cold War and a historian whose mind has been primed by the most important ideas of both the Eastern and Western traditions. Weeks is afraid neither of 'big ideas' nor minutiae of fact, and is thus well-qualified to help us penetrate through the fog of our most recent war."

Richard Raack Emeritus professor

"Dr. Albert Weeks gives readers a thoughtful set of criteria for which to weigh the pros and cons of starting war. The ancient just vs. unjust war criteria, appraised systematically by Weeks, are of vital importance in establishing the moral foundation in initiating any war. Discussion of these touchstones, when applied to the Iraq War begun by the U.S. in 2003, is especially timely.

As the great military thinker Clausewitz wrote in Napoleonic times that the moral factor in waging war becomes the determining factor as a government decides on a policy of waging war against another state. Politics and war-making, Clausewitz emphasized, are intertwined. President Abraham Lincoln in the Civil War understood this connection. American presidents nowadays need the same wisdom."

Richard Raack Emeritus professor, California State Univeristy, East Bay and author of Stalin's Drive to the West, 1939-1945

Richard Raack Emeritus professor

"Dr. Albert Weeks gives readers a thoughtful set of criteria for which to weigh the pros and cons of starting war. The ancient just vs. unjust war criteria, appraised systematically by Weeks, are of vital importance in establishing the moral foundation in initiating any war. Discussion of these touchstones, when applied to the Iraq War begun by the U.S. in 2003, is especially timely.

As the great military thinker Clausewitz wrote in Napoleonic times that the moral factor in waging war becomes the determining factor as a government decides on a policy of waging war against another state. Politics and war-making, Clausewitz emphasized, are intertwined. President Abraham Lincoln in the Civil War understood this connection. American presidents nowadays need the same wisdom.'

"

Neil MarinovichProfessor

"In his The Choice of War, Albert Weeks has avoided the pitfall of descending into polemics and partisan politics, while at the same time presenting an insightful critique of the American invasion of Iraq and of American policy regarding detainees. It is about time that an honest evaluation of American strategy and policy in Iraq is now available; this book is both timely and topical and is ideally suited for college students who want to better understand the current crisis that the United States still faces as we attempt to extricate ourselves from Iraq. Most admirably Mr. Weeks does not seek to chastise unnecessarily those responsible for our failed mission in Iraq, but rather he has provided us with a guidebook that can help our nation repair the damage to American honor and prestige that has arisen from our ill-conceived and ill-advised invasion of Iraq."

Larry R. ThompsonPresident

"In this book, Dr. Albert Weeks cogently presents an analysis and a survey of the concepts for waging a 'justifiable war' versus an unjustifiable one. By tackling this important issue directly, Dr. Weeks' book can serve to provide an antidote to initiating wars that fail to serve the national interests and violate moral principles."

From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews