The Exigency for Stricter Gun Control Legislation in the United States of America: Why The Constitution's Second Amendment Provision for the

The Exigency for Stricter Gun Control Legislation in the United States of America: Why The Constitution's Second Amendment Provision for the "Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms" is Obsolete

by Yesika Mariela Carrasquillo
The Exigency for Stricter Gun Control Legislation in the United States of America: Why The Constitution's Second Amendment Provision for the

The Exigency for Stricter Gun Control Legislation in the United States of America: Why The Constitution's Second Amendment Provision for the "Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms" is Obsolete

by Yesika Mariela Carrasquillo

Paperback

$4.08 
  • SHIP THIS ITEM
    Qualifies for Free Shipping
  • PICK UP IN STORE
    Check Availability at Nearby Stores

Related collections and offers


Overview

The United States of America faces an unprecedented gun violence crisis, as mass shootings have now averaged more than one per day. As of January 1, 2023, the U.S.A. has suffered over 200 mass shootings, surpassing the number of days since the year began. Accordingly, the central point of contention regarding this bloody epidemic of human carnage concerns the ease of access to high-powered and other types of military-grade weapons, including but not limited to assault rifles, a result of the Supreme Court of the United States ruling in the District of Columbia v. Heller case from 2008, where the Court ruled that the individual civilian right to possess firearms unconnected with militia service is guaranteed by the Second Amendment. In 2010, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the Heller ruling in the McDonald v. Chicago case by incorporating the Second Amendment through the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause, making it fully applicable against the states and severely restricting the extent to which states could legally enact gun control legislation. Last year, in the case of New York State Rifle and Pistol Association Inc. v. Bruen (2022), the Supreme Court essentially prohibited stringent gun control legislation from being enacted, having decided that lower courts cannot consider governmental or public interests, such as enhancing security, when evaluating conflicts between gun control laws and the Second Amendment. However, the Supreme Court's consistent rulings upholding individual gun rights comprise erroneous misinterpretations of the Second Amendment. This publication primarily incorporates applied, analytical, and doctrinal legal research to thoroughly examine numerous judicial, procedural and substantive aspects relating to the U.S. Supreme Court's interpretation and ruling that the Second Amendment guarantees the individual right to possess firearms. This publication aims to investigate the flawed nature of the Supreme Court's pro-gun precedent. Pertinent ethical considerations concerning the exigency of implementing stricter gun control legislation throughout the United States of America will also be analyzed. The statistics presented are secondary external data.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9798855625370
Publisher: Barnes & Noble Press
Publication date: 05/10/2023
Pages: 42
Product dimensions: 5.00(w) x 8.00(h) x 0.09(d)

About the Author

Yesika Mariela Carrasquillo is a Summa Cum Laude and Phi Theta Kappa scholar who faced many life challenges at an early age, including completing the seventh grade late at sixteen, skipping the eighth grade, and bypassing all her high school years before obtaining her North Dakota GED at sixteen. Notwithstanding, she overcame this seemingly insurmountable predicament by being accepted to Herkimer College - State University of New York at sixteen. Presently, she earned her Associate of Applied Science in Legal Studies (2023) at eighteen and her Paralegal Studies Certificate (2022). Yesika also holds a Professional Certificate in Leadership and Communication from HarvardX (2023), a Legal Technology Certificate from the National Society for Legal Technology (2022), a Verified Certificate from HarvardX, Harvard University, in Contract Law: From Trust to Promise to Contract (2022), and a Verified Certificate from HarvardX, Harvard University, in U.S. Political Institutions: Congress Presidency, Courts and Bureaucracy (2021). Writing from the heart on this national hot-button issue, Yesika has incorporated numerous advanced legal research and writing methodologies to investigate the flawed nature of the U.S. Supreme Court’s pro-gun precedent. The author utilizes her legal knowledge to demonstrate that the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment was not enacted to protect an inalienable civilian right to possess firearms.

Ms. Carrasquillo is a member in good standing of the American Bar Association (Paralegal), the National Association of Legal Assistants (NALA), the British Columbia Paralegal Association, Phi Theta Kappa International Honor Society, the National Society of Collegiate Scholars, and Golden Key International Honour Society. A profound and avant-garde thinker, Yesika consistently maintained a cumulative and individual course GPA of 4.0, refining her research skills to become a prolific researcher, writer, and author on ResearchGate at eighteen. She ranks in the top five percent of researchers among her peers. Her research interests vary from psychology, law, jurisprudence, political science, conservation and environment, and social science. Yesika is currently pursuing her Bachelor’s degree. As a multifaceted interdisciplinary academician, she aspires to advance her legal career by becoming an attorney, utilizing her abilities to benefit our world.
From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews