The First Amendment: [Connected eBook]

The First Amendment: [Connected eBook]

The First Amendment: [Connected eBook]

The First Amendment: [Connected eBook]

Hardcover(Seventh Edition)

$314.00 
  • SHIP THIS ITEM
    Qualifies for Free Shipping
  • PICK UP IN STORE
    Check Availability at Nearby Stores

Related collections and offers


Overview

Buy a new version of this textbook and receive access to the Connected eBook on Casebook Connect, including lifetime access to the online ebook with highlight, annotation, and search capabilities. Access also includes an outline tool and other helpful resources. Connected eBooks provide what you need most to be successful in your law school classes.



From the same authorship team behind the highly successful Constitutional Law and among the leading casebooks in the field, The First Amendment provides a comprehensive and accessible review of speech and religion jurisprudence under the First Amendment. The eminent authorship team, whose members are distinguished both in teaching and scholarship, combines textual, historical, theoretical, and doctrinal approaches in an inclusive and creative survey of the essential elements of modern First Amendment doctrine. It has been completely updated to incorporate recent developments in the field, including campaign finance and government speech, and provides a broader discussion of modern First Amendment issues, including those related to modern technology.

New to the Seventh Edition:

● New material on recent developments in free speech and press doctrine
  • Discussion of the implications of Iancu v. Brunetti, dealing with the constitutionality of a federal law prohibiting the registration of "disparaging" trademarks
  • Discussion of the issue of flags on government property in Shurtleff v. Boston
  • Discussion of campaign finance regulation in Federal Elections Commission v. Ted Cruz
  • Discussion of the Court's controversial 2023 decision in Counterman v. Colorado
  • Discussion of the Court's controversial 2023 decision in 303 Creative v. Elenis
● New material on recent developments in religion clause doctrine
  • Discussion of the implications of the Bladensburg Cross case for the doctrine replacing the Lemon test
  • Discussion of the Court’s elaboration of the “individualized determination” component of the Smith test, including its application in COVID related cases and in Fulton v. Philadelphia

Professors and students will benefit from: 

● Rigorous questions in the Notes
● Carefully selected and challenging excerpts from articles and books by leading First Amendment scholars
● Thoughtful organization of topics and cases designed to challenge students and to illuminate the evolution and current state of First Amendment jurisprudence

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9798889063025
Publisher: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business
Publication date: 02/01/2024
Series: Aspen Casebook Series
Edition description: Seventh Edition
Pages: 608
Product dimensions: 7.38(w) x 10.00(h) x (d)

Table of Contents

Prefacexxi
Acknowledgmentsxxiii
Editorial Noticexxxv
The First Amendmentxxxvii
The Constitution of the United Statesxxxix
Biographical Noteslvii
First Amendment Timelinelxxiii
Part IFreedom of Expression1
IThe History and Philosophy of Free Expression3
Note: The History of Free Expression3
Note: The Philosophy of Free Expression9
Note: Organization18
IIContent-Based Restrictions: Dangerous Ideas and Information19
A.Expression that Induces Unlawful Conduct19
Shaffer v. United States20
Masses Publishing Co. v. Patten21
Schenck v. United States24
Note: Shaffer, Masses, and Schenck25
Frohwerk v. United States28
Debs v. United States29
Abrams v. United States30
Note: Abrams and the Emergence of the Holmes/Brandeis Tradition33
Gitlow v. New York35
Note: Gitlow and the Question of Deference39
Whitney v. California41
Note: The Brandeis Concurrence, the Right of Association, and the Road to Dennis45
Dennis v. United States48
Note: Dennis and the Communist Conspiracy53
Note: The Road to Brandenburg56
Brandenburg v. Ohio59
Note: The Brandenburg Formulation61
Note: From Schenck to Brandenburg, and Beyond64
B.Speech that "Threatens"65
Bridges v. California66
Note: Contempt by Publication and the Problem of Threats68
C.Expression that Provokes a Hostile Audience Reaction72
Terminiello v. Chicago72
Cantwell v. Connecticut73
Note: Cantwell, the Hostile Audience, and the Subversive Advocacy Analogy75
Feiner v. New York76
Note: Feiner, Kunz, and the Search for Mechanisms of Control79
Note: Revising the Feiner Approach80
Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire83
Note: Fighting Words85
Note: The Skokie Controversy89
D.Expression that Discloses Confidential Information92
Landmark Communications, Inc. v. Virginia92
Note: Landmark and the Problem of Confidentiality93
Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart93
New York Times Co. v. United States; United States v. Washington Post Co.95
Note: Nebraska Press and the Pentagon Papers103
Note: The Progressive Controversy106
Note: Terrorism and the First Amendment108
Note: Dangerous Ideas and Information--Final Thoughts110
IIIOverbreadth, Vagueness, and Prior Restraint113
A.Overbreadth and Vagueness113
Gooding v. Wilson113
Note: Overbreadth117
Note: Vagueness122
B.Prior Restraint124
Lovell v. Griffin125
Note: Licensing as Prior Restraint126
Near v. Minnesota131
Note: Injunction as Prior Restraint133
IVContent-Based Restrictions: "Low" Value Speech139
A.False Statements of Fact140
New York Times v. Sullivan140
Note: "The Central Meaning" of New York Times v. Sullivan146
Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts; Associated Press v. Walker150
Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.151
Note: Public and Private Figures, Public and Private Speech157
Dun & Bradstreet v. Greenmoss Builders158
Note: Other False Statements of Fact160
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell161
B."Nonnewsworthy" Disclosures of "Private" Information163
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn163
Note: Invasion of Privacy and the First Amendment166
C.Commercial Speech169
Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council169
Note: Virginia Pharmacy and "The Free Flow of Commercial Information"175
Note: Truthful, Nondeceptive Commercial Advertising After Virginia Pharmacy178
Central Hudson Gas v. Public Service Commission of New York180
Note: Truthful, Nondeceptive Commercial Advertising After Central Hudson181
Posadas de Puerto Rico Associates v. Tourism Co. of Puerto Rico182
44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island184
Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reilly185
Thompson v. Western States Medical Center187
Note: Truthful, Nondeceptive Commercial Advertising After Liquormart, Lorillard, and Thompson190
Note: Additional Regulations of Commercial Speech191
Note: Labor Disputes and the First Amendment195
D.Obscenity197
Roth v. United States; Alberts v. California198
Note: Obscenity and Free Expression199
Note: Developments in the Law of "Obscenity"--1957-1973203
Miller v. California206
Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton209
Note: The 1973 Reformulation and Its Aftermath214
New York v. Ferber218
Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition221
E.The Lewd, the Profane, and the Indecent224
Cohen v. California225
Note: Profanity, Cohen, and the Captive Audience229
Erznoznik v. Jacksonville232
FCC v. Pacifica Foundation233
Sable Communications, Inc. v. FCC239
Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium, Inc. v. FCC240
Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union242
United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc.243
Note: The Problem of "Indecent" Expression245
Young v. American Mini-Theatres246
City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres251
City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books252
Note: Zoning and Nude Dancing253
F.Hate Speech and Pornography255
Beauharnais v. Illinois255
Note: Group Defamation and "Hate Speech"258
R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul263
Wisconsin v. Mitchell271
Note: R.A.V. and Mitchell272
Note: Pornography and the Victimization of Women274
Note: "Low" Value Speech--Final Thoughts280
VContent-Neutral Restrictions: Limitations on the Means of Communication and the Problem of Content-Neutrality281
A.General Principles281
Schneider v. State281
Martin v. City of Struthers282
Kovacs v. Cooper283
Metromedia, Inc. v. San Diego285
City of Ladue v. Gilleo286
Bartnicki v. Vopper287
Note: The Search for Principles289
Note: The Meaning of "Content-Neutrality"291
B.Speech on Public Property: The Public Forum295
1.The Public Forum: Streets and Parks295
Commonwealth v. Davis295
Hague v. CIO296
Schneider v. State297
Note: Regulating the Public Forum298
Note: Devices for Regulating the Public Forum304
2.The Public Forum: Other Publicly Owned Property306
Adderley v. Florida306
Note: "No Less Than a Private Owner of Property"?308
International Society for Krishna Consciousness v. Lee312
Note: Modern Public Forum Doctrine315
Note: The Right to a "Private" Forum315
3.The Public Forum: Unequal Access and the Problem of Content-Neutrality317
Police Department of Chicago v. Mosley318
Note: Mosley and the "Equality" of Ideas320
Lehman v. City of Shaker Heights325
Note: Lehman and the Limits of Mosley328
Perry Educators' Association v. Perry Local Educators' Association330
Note: Quintessential, Designated, and Nonpublic Forums332
Note: Religious Expression and the Meaning of "Viewpoint Neutrality"337
4.Unequal Access and the Problem of Government Speech340
Southeastern Promotions v. Conrad341
Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District v. Pico342
Regan v. Taxation with Representation of Washington345
Rust v. Sullivan346
Note: The Implications of Rust and the Rosenberger Distinction349
Legal Services Corporation v. Velazquez352
National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley355
C.Symbolic Conduct360
United States v. O'Brien361
Note: Draft Card Burning and the First Amendment366
Note: Flag Desecration and Misuse371
Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc.376
City of Erie v. PAP's A.M.379
Note: Political Boycotts381
Note: Computer Code382
D.Money and Free Expression: Regulation of Solicitation, Contribution, and Expenditure383
Village of Schaumburg v. Citizens for a Better Environment383
Buckley v. Valeo385
Note: Buckley and the Problem of Abridging Speech to "Enhance" the Electoral Process394
First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti400
Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce402
Note: Additional Regulation of the Electoral Process404
Note: The Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform Act of 2002410
E.Other Means of Expression: Litigation, Association, and the Right Not to Speak412
1.Litigation412
NAACP v. Button412
Note: Litigation and the First Amendment414
2.Association416
Roberts v. U.S. Jaycees416
Note: Association and the First Amendment417
Boy Scouts of America v. Dale418
Note: The Meaning of Dale421
3.The Right Not to Speak424
Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins424
Note: Compelled Affirmation, Expression, and Association: The Right Not to Speak424
Note: Content-Neutral Restrictions--Final Thoughts429
VIAdditional Problems431
A.Restricted Environments: The Military, Schools, and Prisons431
1.The Military431
Parker v. Levy431
2.Schools433
Tinker v. Des Moines School District433
3.Prisons437
Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners' Union437
B.Public Employment438
1.Partisan Political Activity440
U.S. Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers440
Note: Mitchell, Letter Carriers, and Broadrick442
2.Criticizing Government Policy443
Pickering v. Board of Education443
Note: Pickering and Its Implications445
3.Patronage447
Elrod v. Burns447
Branti v. Finkel450
4.Subversive Advocacy and Associations452
Adler v. Board of Education452
Elfbrandt v. Russell453
Note: Loyalty Programs and the First Amendment454
5.Confidential Information455
Snepp v. United States455
Note: Snepp, Public Employment, and the Disclosure of Confidential Information459
C.Compelled Disclosure of Expression, Belief, and Association461
1.General Principles461
NAACP v. Alabama461
Talley v. California462
McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission463
Buckley v. Valeo464
2.Public Employees and Licensees465
Shelton v. Tucker465
Konigsberg v. State Bar467
3.Legislative Investigations468
Barenblatt v. United States469
Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigating Committee471
D.Freedom of the Press473
1.A "Preferred" Status for the Press?473
2.A Right to "Gather" News?474
Branzburg v. Hayes474
Note: A Right to Gather News?479
Pell v. Procunier482
Houchins v. KQED483
Note: A Press Right of Access to Government Information?485
Richmond Newspapers v. Virginia487
Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court491
Note: Variations on the Press Right of Access492
3.Differential Treatment of the Press494
Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue495
Note: Differential Treatment497
4.Regulating the Press to "Improve" the Marketplace of Ideas499
Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo499
Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC500
Note: Regulating the Airwaves503
Turner Broadcasting System Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission509
Note: Turner and the Regulation of Cable511
Note: The First Amendment in Cyberspace515
Note: Free Expression--Final Thoughts519
Part IIThe Constitutiona nd Religion521
VII
From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews