![The King's Indian According to Tigran Petrosian](http://img.images-bn.com/static/redesign/srcs/images/grey-box.png?v11.9.4)
![The King's Indian According to Tigran Petrosian](http://img.images-bn.com/static/redesign/srcs/images/grey-box.png?v11.9.4)
Paperback
-
SHIP THIS ITEMTemporarily Out of Stock Online
-
PICK UP IN STORECheck Availability at Nearby Stores
Available within 2 business hours
Related collections and offers
Overview
Product Details
ISBN-13: | 9781941270578 |
---|---|
Publisher: | Russell Enterprises, Incorporated |
Publication date: | 06/17/2019 |
Pages: | 424 |
Product dimensions: | 7.00(w) x 9.90(h) x 1.00(d) |
About the Author
Read an Excerpt
Chapter 1: The Classical Variation Let's begin our overview with the “classics,” the most popular and logical setup in this opening. Here, as in many other variations, Petrosian readily used rare and unpopular systems. Thus, over a number of years he defended Flohr's old continuation d4-d5, finding more and more opportunities for White. One of the most successful of his finds was the system with 8.Bg5, known today as the Petrosian System. With Black, he was also not a slave of fashion, giving preference to the traditional method of defense: 7...Nbd7. DIAGRAM When this position just started to appear in tournaments, it was considered almost a must to continue with 10.Nd2 (see games A1-1, 2, 3) or 10.Ne1 with the idea of promptly exchanging the knight on c5. In his game against Alexey Suetin (A1-4) Tigran Petrosian turned a new page in the theory of this variation, proving that the harmless-looking bishop move on g5 is not so harmless. However, his relationship with the King's Indian Defense was rocky at first... (1) A1.1 Petrosian – Geller 17th USSR Championship Moscow 1949 1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 g6 3.c4 Bg7 4.Nc3 0-0 5.e4 d6 6.Be2 e5 7.d5 Nbd7 8.0-0 Nc5 9.Nd2 a5 10.Qc2 DIAGRAM All the moves were made according to the theory circa 1949. Geller's next move was a novelty, which he had prepared for this game specifically. 10...Bh6!? Using the knight's temporary stop on d2 to force the exchange of the dark-square bishops. Today, such an interpretation of King's Indian Defense has already become standard and even basic, but in those days its evaluation was controversial. For example, the well-known theorist Peter Romanovsky, thinking that the g7-bishop had to defend the king, annotated this idea as rather dubious, and the game's commentator, master Victor Goglidze, called it “original, but wrong.” 11.Nb3 Bxc1 12.Nxc5 A positional error, very uncommon for Petrosian. However, being young at the time, he probably had not yet mastered all the subtleties of his trademark opening. 12...Bh6 13.Nd3 Nd7 The King's Indian bishop, after miraculously escaping death, soon starts to retaliate for the disrespect. 14.a3 f5 15.b4 Nf6 16.Nb2 The subpar exchange starts to bear fruit. White is denied the natural opportunity to reinforce the e4-square with a pawn, for example, 16.f3 Be3+ 17.Kh1 f4 and then ...Nh5, ...Qh4 with a typical checkmate idea on the dark squares. It seems that 16.Bf3 was still better, as d3 was the perfect square for the knight...
Table of Contents
Preface Levon Aronian 4
Foreword Igor Zaitsev 5
From the Author 9
Part I Tabiyas 12
Chapter 1 Classical Variation 15
Chapter 2 The Sämisch System 61
Chapter 3 The Fianchetto Variation 126
Chapter 4 The Benoni 201
Chapter 5 Other Systems 264
Part II Elements of Success 297
Chapter 6 Portrait of a Chess Player 297
Chapter 7 Lessons from Petrosian 321
Chapter 8 The Problem of the Exchange 335
Chapter 9 "Furman's Bishop" 343
Chapter 10 "Pawns are the soul of chess" 348
Chapter 11 Playing by Analogy 351
Chapter 12 Maneuvering Battle 356
Part III Experiments 363
Chapter 13 Realist or Romantic? 363
Chapter 14 The King's Indian with Colors - and Flanks - Reversed 379
In Lieu of a Postscript 406
Appendix
Index of Opponents 407
Bibliography 410
Index of Tabiyas 412
ECO/Opening/Tabiya Index 420