Zitser's study is based on a range of sources impressive for both its variety and breadth: hitherto unprocessed personal and state archives; dispatches and accounts of foreign diplomats; publications of official government papers; monographic studies in many languages; contemporary engravings and illustrations. All the forms of evidence, facts, and events are subjected to thorough-going analysis in order to reveal their communicative and symbolic content.... Zitser's book is extraordinarily interesting and results in original reflections about the reign of Peter I and his contemporary cultural world.
The New Review/Novyi Zhurnal
Ernest Zitser has produced an innovative new study of the transformation of political discourse during the reign of Peter the Great... Zitser's study relies on the personal letters of Peter the Great, eyewitness accounts, official administrative documents, and visual representations, such as engravings, paintings, and drawings. These rich sources allow Zitser to present a more nuanced understanding of Petrine political discourse and the use of 'self-conscious and ironic wordplay' by Peter and his courtiers. The result is a fascinating, well-written, creative new interpretation of Peter's parodies and spectacles, one that is both accessible to an undergraduate audience and essential reading for Russian history scholars.
Some of the strangest and most puzzling aspects of the reign of Peter the Great of Russia involve the play armies, mock religious processions, and other carnivalesque spectacles staged at the royal court throughout Peter's long reign.... Zitser argues that the activities of institutions such as the Most Comical All-Drunken Council were crucial elements in an attempt to elevate the tsar's persona above court factions and clan politics, as well as to establish his domination over ecclesiastical affairs. Zitser focuses his attention on the language used by the tsar and his entourage to transform a medieval Muscovy into a modern, imperial Russia, while also emphasizing the connections of the spectacles and rhetoric with the pan-European baroque court culture of early modern Europe.
Zitser argues that 'the Drunken Council was not an institution at all, parodic or otherwise; it was a discourse, that is, a way of speaking about royal authority that was constitutive of political relations as much as a reflection of the way power was distributed and organized at the court of Peter the Great.' It is this insight or thesis that allows Zitser to seek a harmonious integration of seemingly disparate elements in the culture of Peter's reign and to provide both a contemporary European context as well as a modern theoretical dimension by his wide-ranging reference to primary and secondary sources. The book offers a remarkably sustained and for the most part convincing demonstration of what Zitser calls 'a heretofore neglected aspect of Petrine political theology' (p. 169). It is a study which all students of Peter and his period will neglect at their peril.
Journal of European Studies
"This is one of the most important pieces of scholarship on early modern Russian history to have been produced in the past decade. Ernest A. Zitser's book will change the way people think about the reign of Peter the Great and will amend the persistent but incorrect view that Peter 'secularized' Russia and that his personal relationships were based on simple 'meritocracy.'"
"Peter the Great remains one of the most interesting and most disputed persons in Russian history. Although more biographies have been written about him than about any other tsar, Peter's role in history and the motives of his politics still often seem obscure. Ernest A. Zitser shows in his book that Peter still holds many new aspects for the historian who knows to pose the right questions.... Zitser's book is a highly valuable contribution to research and to our picture of Peter and his reign."
"The Transfigured Kingdom . . . is a highly original effort to decrypt the coded messages conveyed by ceremonial events at Peter's court. . . . Ernest Zitser takes us on an enjoyable romp through the arcane mysteries of Imperial merrymaking."—John Keep, Times Literary Supplement, October 22, 2004
"Zitser's study is based on a range of sources impressive for both its variety and breadth: hitherto unprocessed personal and state archives; dispatches and accounts of foreign diplomats; publications of official government papers; monographic studies in many languages; contemporary engravings and illustrations. All the forms of evidence, facts, and events are subjected to thorough-going analysis in order to reveal their communicative and symbolic content. . . . Zitser's book is extraordinarily interesting and results in original reflections about the reign of Peter I and his contemporary cultural world."—Marc Raeff, The New Review/Novyi Zhurnal, 237 (2004)
"Ernest Zitser has produced an innovative new study of the transformation of political discourse during the reign of Peter the Great . . . Zitser's study relies on the personal letters of Peter the Great, eyewitness accounts, official administrative documents, and visual representations, such as engravings, paintings, and drawings. These rich sources allow Zitser to present a more nuanced understanding of Petrine political discourse and the use of 'self-conscious and ironic wordplay' by Peter and his courtiers. The result is a fascinating, well-written, creative new interpretation of Peter's parodies and spectacles, one that is both accessible to an undergraduate audience and essential reading for Russian history scholars."—Russian Review, 64: 2 April 2005
"Some of the strangest and most puzzling aspects of the reign of Peter the Great of Russia involve the play armies, mock religious processions, and other carnivalesque spectacles staged at the royal court throughout Peter's long reign. . . . Zitser argues that the activities of institutions such as the Most Comical All-Drunken Council were crucial elements in an attempt to elevate the tsar's persona above court factions and clan politics, as well as to establish his domination over ecclesiastical affairs. Zitser focuses his attention on the language used by the tsar and his entourage to transform a medieval Muscovy into a modern, imperial Russia, while also emphasizing the connections of the spectacles and rhetoric with the pan-European baroque court culture of early modern Europe."—Choice, March 2005
"Zitser argues that 'the Drunken Council was not an institution at all, parodic or otherwise; it was a discourse, that is, a way of speaking about royal authority that was constitutive of political relations as much as a reflection of the way power was distributed and organized at the court of Peter the Great.' It is this insight or thesis that allows Zitser to seek a harmonious integration of seemingly disparate elements in the culture of Peter's reign and to provide both a contemporary European context as well as a modern theoretical dimension by his wide-ranging reference to primary and secondary sources. The book offers a remarkably sustained and for the most part convincing demonstration of what Zitser calls 'a heretofore neglected aspect of Petrine political theology' (p. 169). It is a study which all students of Peter and his period will neglect at their peril."—Anthony Cross, Journal of European Studies, 35(3) Sep 2005
"This is one of the most important pieces of scholarship on early modern Russian history to have been produced in the past decade. Ernest A. Zitser's book will change the way people think about the reign of Peter the Great and will amend the persistent but incorrect view that Peter 'secularized' Russia and that his personal relationships were based on simple 'meritocracy.'"—Lindsey Hughes, School of Slavonic and East European Studies, University College London
"Peter the Great remains one of the most interesting and most disputed persons in Russian history. Although more biographies have been written about him than about any other tsar, Peter's role in history and the motives of his politics still often seem obscure. Ernest A. Zitser shows in his book that Peter still holds many new aspects for the historian who knows to pose the right questions. . . . Zitser's book is a highly valuable contribution to research and to our picture of Peter and his reign."—Martina Winkler, Department of History, Humboldt University Berlin
"The Transfigured Kingdom . . . is a highly original effort to decrypt the coded messages conveyed by ceremonial events at Peter's court. . . . Ernest Zitser takes us on an enjoyable romp through the arcane mysteries of Imperial merrymaking."Times Literary Supplement, October 22, 2004
"Zitser's study is based on a range of sources impressive for both its variety and breadth: hitherto unprocessed personal and state archives; dispatches and accounts of foreign diplomats; publications of official government papers; monographic studies in many languages; contemporary engravings and illustrations. All the forms of evidence, facts, and events are subjected to thorough-going analysis in order to reveal their communicative and symbolic content. . . . Zitser's book is extraordinarily interesting and results in original reflections about the reign of Peter I and his contemporary cultural world."The New Review/Novyi Zhurnal, 237 (2004)
"Zitser argues that ‘the Drunken Council was not an institution at all, parodic or otherwise; it was a discourse, that is, a way of speaking about royal authority that was constitutive of political relations as much as a reflection of the way power was distributed and organized at the court of Peter the Great’ (pp. 8-9). It is this insight or thesis that allows Zitser to seek a harmonious integration of seemingly disparate elements in the culture of Peter’s reign and to provide both a contemporary European context as well as a modern theoretical dimension by his wide-ranging reference to primary and secondary sources. The book offers a remarkably sustained and for the most part convincing demonstration of what Zitser calls ‘a heretofore neglected aspect of Petrine political theology’ (p. 169). It is a study which all students of Peter and his period will neglect at their peril."Journal of European Studies, 35(3) Sep 2005
