Viktor Shklovsky's Heritage in Literature, Arts, and Philosophy

by Slav N. Gratchev (Editor), Howard Mancing (Editor), Irina Evdokimova (Introduction), Michael Eskin (Contribution by), Michael Everson (Contribution by)

Overview

This book examines the heritage of Victor Shklovsky in a variety of disciplines. To achieve this end, Slav N. Gratchev and Howard Mancing draw upon colleagues from eight different countries across the world—the United States, Canada, Russia, England, Scotland, the Netherlands, Norway, and China—in order to bring the widest variety of points of view on the subject. Viktor Shklovsky’s Heritage in Literature, Arts, and Philosophy is more than just another collection of essays of literary criticism: the editors invited scholars from different disciplines—literature, cinematography, and philosophy—who have dealt with Shklovsky’s heritage and saw its practical application in their fields. Therefore, all of these essays are written in a variety of humanist academic and scholarly styles, all engaging and dynamic.

Product Details

ISBN-13:	9781498597920
Publisher:	Lexington Books
Publication date:	07/01/2019
Pages:	286
Product dimensions:	6.32(w) x 9.01(h) x 1.04(d)

About the Author

Slav N. Gratchev is associate professor of Spanish at Marshall University.



Howard Mancing is professor emeritus of Spanish at Purdue University.

Table of Contents

Introduction

Irina Evdokimova



Part I: Shklovsky’s Heritage in Literature

Chapter 1: Thinking in Images, Differently: Shklovsky, Yakubinsky, and the Power of Evidence

Michael Eskin

Chapter 2: The Odyssey of Viktor Shklovsky: Life after Formalism

Basil Lvoff

Chapter 3: The Eternal Wonderer, or Who was Viktor Shklovsky?

Slav N. Gratchev

Chapter 4: Defamiliarization in translating Lewis Carroll’s Wonderland.

Victor Fet and Michael Everson

Chapter 5: Viktor Shklovsky on Narrative

David Gorman

Chapter 6: Defamiliarization and Genre: Semiotic Subversions in The Crying of Lot 49 and “Death and the Compass.”

Melissa Garr

Chapter 7: Shklovsky and Things, or Why Tolstoy’s Sofa should matter.

Sergei Oushakine

Chapter 8: The Motherland will Notice her Terrible Mistake:* Paradox of Futurism in Jasienski, Mayakovsky and Shklovsky

Norbert Francis

Chapter 9: Framing and Threading Non-Literary Discourse into the Structure of Cervantes´s Don Quixote II

Rachel Schmidt

Chapter 10: Shklovsky and World Literature.

Grant Hamilton

Chapter 11: Racism and Robots: Defamiliarizing Social Justice in Rosa Montero’s Tears in the Rain and the 21st Century.

Steven Mills



Part II: Shklovsky’s Heritage in Arts

Chapter 12: Shklovsky’s Dog and Mulvey’s Pleasure: The Secret Life of Defamiliarization.

Eric Naiman

Chapter 13: Reading Viktor Shklovsky’s “Arts as Technique” in the Context of Early Cinema.

Annie Van den Oever



Part III: Shklovsky’s Heritage in Philosophy

Chapter 14: Philosophical work of Russian formalism

Alexander Markov

Chapter 15: Shklovsky as a Technique: Literary Theory and the Biographical Strategies of a Soviet Intellectual

Ilya Kalinin

Chapter 16: From a New Seeing to a New Acting: Viktor Shklovsky's 'stranenie and Analyses of Games and Play.

Holger Pötzsch

Editorial Reviews

Engaging, uneven, and seminal - very much reflecting the spirit of Shklovsky's own work - , this wide-ranging collection revisits some of his key ideas and tests their relevance today.

Galin Tihanov

Of all the Petrograd Formalists, Viktor Shklovsky wrote the most brashly, loved the most lyrically, coped most pragmatically with the horrors of his era, and lived the longest. As critic, creative writer and closet lay philosopher, Shklovsky was—as one contributor to this volume puts it—always a public figure in history but careful “to avoid being one with it.” It took hard work to survive. To make a living, Shklovsky edited banned film scripts to get them past the censor and ghostwrote books for less gifted colleagues. As he confessed to his Italian interviewer Serena Vitale near the end of his life, there were only two things he never wrote: poetry, and denunciations.


This wide-ranging volume celebrates Shklovsky’s legacy in thing theory, feminist formalism, defamiliarization in film, the limits of the translatable, and it provides newly-sensitized readings of world literature from Cervantes through Tolstoy, Lewis Carroll, Pynchon, and Borges. A fine tribute to Soviet Russia’s most cosmopolitan monolingual critic.

Caryl Emerson Caryl Emerson

Viktor Shklovsky (1893–1984) was a powerhouse of early Soviet literary and cultural theory. He was also one of the earliest Soviet film critics, and from the 1920s through the 1970s he worked as a screenwriter for Goskin (i.e., USSR State Committee for Cinematography). This collection of 16 essays examines all facets of Shklovsky’s legacy on literature, criticism, cinematography, and philosophy. Unlike most scholarship on Shklovsky, the present volume treats not only his best-known works—for example, Art as Device (1917) and Theory of Prose (1925)—but all his contributions and his influence into the late 1970s. The book’s three parts focus on Shklovsky’s three main areas of investigation: literature, the arts, and philosophy. Particular focus is placed on his legacy in the broad Soviet cultural landscape: on early cinema, on philosopher Yuri Tynyanov, on the Soviet intelligentsia, and on world literature. As one would expect, several essays explore the impact of Shklovsky’s concept of defamiliarization on other authors/works and contexts, from Lewis Carroll’s Wonderland to Cervantes’s Don Quixote. This is a book for specialists interested in expanding their knowledge of Shklovsky and his impact beyond his well-known work. Summing Up: Recommended. Graduate students, researchers, faculty.

Choice

Viktor Shklovsky (1893–1984) was a powerhouse of early Soviet literary and cultural theory. He was also one of the earliest Soviet film critics, and from the 1920s through the 1970s he worked as a screenwriter for Goskin (i.e., USSR State Committee for Cinematography). This collection of 16 essays examines all facets of Shklovsky’s legacy on literature, criticism, cinematography, and philosophy. Unlike most scholarship on Shklovsky, the present volume treats not only his best-known works—for example, Art as Device (1917) and Theory of Prose (1925)—but all his contributions and his influence into the late 1970s. The book’s three parts focus on Shklovsky’s three main areas of investigation: literature, the arts, and philosophy. Particular focus is placed on his legacy in the broad Soviet cultural landscape: on early cinema, on philosopher Yuri Tynyanov, on the Soviet intelligentsia, and on world literature. As one would expect, several essays explore the impact of Shklovsky’s concept of defamiliarization on other authors/works and contexts, from Lewis Carroll’s Wonderland to Cervantes’s Don Quixote. This is a book for specialists interested in expanding their knowledge of Shklovsky and his impact beyond his well-known work.
Summing Up: Recommended. Graduate students, researchers, faculty.

CHOICE

Victor Shklovsky, though among the most influential literary theorists of the 20th century, remains, paradoxically, little known. This volume brings together Russianists who contextualize Shklovsky's achievement alongside scholars in other fields—most notably Hispanists—who attest to its impact. If you use the concept of 'defamiliarization' in your classes or publications—and who doesn't?—you will want to read this book.

William Childers

Of all the Petrograd Formalists, Viktor Shklovsky wrote the most brashly, loved the most lyrically, coped most pragmatically with the horrors of his era, and lived the longest. As critic, creative writer and closet lay philosopher, Shklovsky was—as one contributor to this volume puts it—always a public figure in history but careful “to avoid being one with it.” It took hard work to survive. To make a living, Shklovsky edited banned film scripts to get them past the censor and ghostwrote books for less gifted colleagues. As he confessed to his Italian interviewer Serena Vitale near the end of his life, there were only two things he never wrote: poetry, and denunciations.



This wide-ranging volume celebrates Shklovsky’s legacy in thing theory, feminist formalism, defamiliarization in film, the limits of the translatable, and it provides newly-sensitized readings of world literature from Cervantes through Tolstoy, Lewis Carroll, Pynchon, and Borges. A fine tribute to Soviet Russia’s most cosmopolitan monolingual critic.

Caryl Emerson

Viktor Shklovsky (1893–1984) was a powerhouse of early Soviet literary and cultural theory. He was also one of the earliest Soviet film critics, and from the 1920s through the 1970s he worked as a screenwriter for Goskin (i.e., USSR State Committee for Cinematography). This collection of 16 essays examines all facets of Shklovsky’s legacy on literature, criticism, cinematography, and philosophy. Unlike most scholarship on Shklovsky, the present volume treats not only his best-known works—for example, Art as Device (1917) and Theory of Prose (1925)—but all his contributions and his influence into the late 1970s. The book’s three parts focus on Shklovsky’s three main areas of investigation: literature, the arts, and philosophy. Particular focus is placed on his legacy in the broad Soviet cultural landscape: on early cinema, on philosopher Yuri Tynyanov, on the Soviet intelligentsia, and on world literature. As one would expect, several essays explore the impact of Shklovsky’s concept of defamiliarization on other authors/works and contexts, from Lewis Carroll’s Wonderland to Cervantes’s Don Quixote. This is a book for specialists interested in expanding their knowledge of Shklovsky and his impact beyond his well-known work.

Summing Up: Recommended. Graduate students, researchers, faculty.

Choice Reviews